-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Add test for checking duplicated branch or-patterns #75580
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
r? @wesleywiser |
Thanks! Having this will be helpful when that issue is resolved so we can see the diff. @bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 204fa8fb136da9d21481731fbf3875ef22d661d8 has been approved by |
This might need a rebase because of other MIR comment changes. |
709a6ed
to
c6ab3ff
Compare
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit c6ab3ff has been approved by |
Add test for checking duplicated branch or-patterns This adds a regression test for checking `or-patterns` in MIR as shown in rust-lang#75439. This doesn't introduce a fix as I'm not sure where it would go(I suspect maybe here: src/librustc_mir_build/build/matches/mod.rs), and I'm not particularly able to fix it. cc: @lzutao
Add test for checking duplicated branch or-patterns This adds a regression test for checking `or-patterns` in MIR as shown in rust-lang#75439. This doesn't introduce a fix as I'm not sure where it would go(I suspect maybe here: src/librustc_mir_build/build/matches/mod.rs), and I'm not particularly able to fix it. cc: @lzutao
Add test for checking duplicated branch or-patterns This adds a regression test for checking `or-patterns` in MIR as shown in rust-lang#75439. This doesn't introduce a fix as I'm not sure where it would go(I suspect maybe here: src/librustc_mir_build/build/matches/mod.rs), and I'm not particularly able to fix it. cc: @lzutao
Add test for checking duplicated branch or-patterns This adds a regression test for checking `or-patterns` in MIR as shown in rust-lang#75439. This doesn't introduce a fix as I'm not sure where it would go(I suspect maybe here: src/librustc_mir_build/build/matches/mod.rs), and I'm not particularly able to fix it. cc: @lzutao
Failed rollup, needs still more rebase |
c6ab3ff
to
6cb6716
Compare
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 6cb6716 has been approved by |
Add test for checking duplicated branch or-patterns This adds a regression test for checking `or-patterns` in MIR as shown in rust-lang#75439. This doesn't introduce a fix as I'm not sure where it would go(I suspect maybe here: src/librustc_mir_build/build/matches/mod.rs), and I'm not particularly able to fix it. cc: @lzutao
Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#73963 (deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn) in libstd/path.rs) - rust-lang#75099 (lint/ty: move fns to avoid abstraction violation) - rust-lang#75502 (Use implicit (not explicit) rules for promotability by default in `const fn`) - rust-lang#75580 (Add test for checking duplicated branch or-patterns) - rust-lang#76310 (Add `[T; N]: TryFrom<Vec<T>>` (insta-stable)) - rust-lang#76400 (Clean up vec benches bench_in_place style) - rust-lang#76434 (do not inline black_box when building for Miri) - rust-lang#76492 (Add associated constant `BITS` to all integer types) - rust-lang#76525 (Add as_str() to string::Drain.) - rust-lang#76636 (assert ScalarMaybeUninit size) - rust-lang#76749 (give *even better* suggestion when matching a const range) - rust-lang#76757 (don't convert types to the same type with try_into (clippy::useless_conversion)) - rust-lang#76796 (Give a better error message when x.py uses the wrong stage for CI) - rust-lang#76798 (Build fixes for RISC-V 32-bit Linux support) Failed merges: r? `@ghost`
…DianQK Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt/issues This resolves a part of rust-lang#116971 . The directory `tests/mir-opt/issues` has only one test issue_75439.rs which should add FileCheck annotations. Originally it was introduced in rust-lang#75580 to confirm that there were duplicated basic blocks against or-patterns, but in rust-lang#123067 the duplication was resolved. So FileCheck should ensure that there is no such duplication any more.
…DianQK Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt/issues This resolves a part of rust-lang#116971 . The directory `tests/mir-opt/issues` has only one test issue_75439.rs which should add FileCheck annotations. Originally it was introduced in rust-lang#75580 to confirm that there were duplicated basic blocks against or-patterns, but in rust-lang#123067 the duplication was resolved. So FileCheck should ensure that there is no such duplication any more.
…DianQK Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt/issues This resolves a part of rust-lang#116971 . The directory `tests/mir-opt/issues` has only one test issue_75439.rs which should add FileCheck annotations. Originally it was introduced in rust-lang#75580 to confirm that there were duplicated basic blocks against or-patterns, but in rust-lang#123067 the duplication was resolved. So FileCheck should ensure that there is no such duplication any more.
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134943 - Shunpoco:116971-mir-opt-issues, r=DianQK Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt/issues This resolves a part of rust-lang#116971 . The directory `tests/mir-opt/issues` has only one test issue_75439.rs which should add FileCheck annotations. Originally it was introduced in rust-lang#75580 to confirm that there were duplicated basic blocks against or-patterns, but in rust-lang#123067 the duplication was resolved. So FileCheck should ensure that there is no such duplication any more.
This adds a regression test for checking
or-patterns
in MIR as shown in #75439.This doesn't introduce a fix as I'm not sure where it would go(I suspect maybe here: src/librustc_mir_build/build/matches/mod.rs), and I'm not particularly able to fix it.
cc: @lzutao