Skip to content

BTreeMap: try to enhance various comments #79363

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2020

Conversation

ssomers
Copy link
Contributor

@ssomers ssomers commented Nov 23, 2020

All in internal documentation, propagating the "key-value pair" notation from public documentation.

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 23, 2020
@jeffparsons
Copy link
Contributor

@ssomers As someone who once tried, and ultimately failed to extend Rust's BTreeMap (I took a swing at implementing a cursor API, naively thinking I could smash it out in a couple of spare evenings), I really appreciate this long campaign of PRs in the area — especially the documentation and organisation improvements! 💖

Can I ask, is this building towards a specific goal? I.e. are you cleaning things up on your way to implementing some RFC?

@ssomers
Copy link
Contributor Author

ssomers commented Nov 25, 2020

@jeffparsons It started as a challenge, now I mostly try to get past it, but what else is there to do these days.

@ssomers ssomers force-pushed the btree_cleanup_comments branch from ffa5b8f to d1a2c0f Compare November 28, 2020 09:58
@ssomers
Copy link
Contributor Author

ssomers commented Nov 28, 2020

added some of the (slightly conflicting, in git's sense of the word) findings in #79347

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

This is great!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 28, 2020

📌 Commit d1a2c0f has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 28, 2020
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2020
…ark-Simulacrum

BTreeMap: try to enhance various comments

All in internal documentation, propagating the "key-value pair" notation from public documentation.

r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2020
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#79327 (Require allocator to be static for boxed `Pin`-API)
 - rust-lang#79340 (Rename "stability" CSS class to "item-info" and combine `document_stability` with `document_short`)
 - rust-lang#79363 (BTreeMap: try to enhance various comments)
 - rust-lang#79395 (Move ui if tests from top-level into `expr/if`)
 - rust-lang#79443 (Improve rustdoc JS tests error output)
 - rust-lang#79464 (Extend doc keyword feature by allowing any ident)
 - rust-lang#79484 (add enable-full-tools to freebsd builds to prevent occasional link er…)
 - rust-lang#79505 (Cleanup: shorter and faster code)
 - rust-lang#79514 (Add test for issue rust-lang#54121: order dependent trait bounds)
 - rust-lang#79516 (Remove unnecessary `mut` binding)
 - rust-lang#79528 (Fix a bootstrap comment)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit bfa854d into rust-lang:master Nov 29, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.50.0 milestone Nov 29, 2020
@ssomers ssomers deleted the btree_cleanup_comments branch November 29, 2020 09:09
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants