Skip to content

Make forget intrinsic safe #80477

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2020
Merged

Make forget intrinsic safe #80477

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2020

Conversation

tmiasko
Copy link
Contributor

@tmiasko tmiasko commented Dec 29, 2020

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @dtolnay

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 29, 2020
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job mingw-check failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
configure: rust.channel         := nightly
configure: rust.debug-assertions := True
configure: llvm.assertions      := True
configure: dist.missing-tools   := True
configure: build.configure-args := ['--enable-sccache', '--disable-manage-submodu ...
configure: writing `config.toml` in current directory
configure: 
configure: run `python /checkout/x.py --help`
configure: 

Comment on lines 155 to 156
// SAFETY: the forget intrinsic could be safe, but there's no point in making it safe since
// we'll be implementing this function soon via `ManuallyDrop`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reassigning to @oli-obk, the person who authored the "there's no point in making it safe" comment.

@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Dec 29, 2020

r? @oli-obk

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned oli-obk and unassigned dtolnay Dec 29, 2020
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Dec 29, 2020

🤷 I just considered the effort of doing a PR not worth it, but now that it's done, let's not let it go to waste

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 29, 2020

📌 Commit 5718cc2 has been approved by oli-obk

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 29, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2020
Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#79812 (Lint on redundant trailing semicolon after item)
 - rust-lang#80348 (remove redundant clones (clippy::redundant_clone))
 - rust-lang#80358 (Edit rustc_span documentation)
 - rust-lang#80457 (Add missing commas to `rustc_ast_pretty::pp` docs)
 - rust-lang#80461 (Add llvm-libunwind change to bootstrap CHANGELOG)
 - rust-lang#80464 (Use Option::map_or instead of open coding it)
 - rust-lang#80465 (Fix typo in ffi-pure.md)
 - rust-lang#80467 (More uses of the matches! macro)
 - rust-lang#80469 (Fix small typo in time comment)
 - rust-lang#80472 (Use sans-serif font for the "all items" page links)
 - rust-lang#80477 (Make forget intrinsic safe)
 - rust-lang#80482 (don't clone copy types)
 - rust-lang#80487 (don't redundantly repeat field names)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 9576ee9 into rust-lang:master Dec 30, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.51.0 milestone Dec 30, 2020
@tmiasko tmiasko deleted the safe-forget branch December 30, 2020 14:16
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants