Skip to content

Fix safety comment #80774

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2021
Merged

Fix safety comment #80774

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2021

Conversation

LingMan
Copy link
Contributor

@LingMan LingMan commented Jan 7, 2021

The size assertion in the comment was inverted compared to the code. After fixing that the implication that (new_size >= old_size) => new_size != 0 still doesn't hold so explain why old_size != 0 at this point.

The size assertion in the comment was inverted compared to the code. After fixing that the implication that `(new_size >= old_size) => new_size != 0` still doesn't hold so explain why `old_size != 0` at this point.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 7, 2021
@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Jan 8, 2021

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 8, 2021

📌 Commit 769fb8a has been approved by nagisa

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 8, 2021
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2021
Fix safety comment

The size assertion in the comment was inverted compared to the code. After fixing that the implication that `(new_size >= old_size) => new_size != 0` still doesn't hold so explain why `old_size != 0` at this point.
This was referenced Jan 10, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2021
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#79502 (Implement From<char> for u64 and u128.)
 - rust-lang#79968 (Improve core::ptr::drop_in_place debuginfo)
 - rust-lang#80774 (Fix safety comment)
 - rust-lang#80801 (Use correct span for structured suggestion)
 - rust-lang#80803 (Remove useless `fill_in` function)
 - rust-lang#80820 (Support `download-ci-llvm` on NixOS)
 - rust-lang#80825 (Remove under-used ImplPolarity enum)
 - rust-lang#80850 (Allow #[rustc_builtin_macro = "name"])
 - rust-lang#80857 (Add comment to `Vec::truncate` explaining `>` vs `>=`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit d64356f into rust-lang:master Jan 10, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.51.0 milestone Jan 10, 2021
@LingMan LingMan deleted the patch-1 branch January 10, 2021 10:55
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants