-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Suggest accessing field when appropriate #81504
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
Minor nitpicks. Ping me when done and I'll r=me once addressed. |
@estebank Review applied. |
I'm really happy with the results, thanks for taking the time! r=me after tackling the last nitpick if you have the time, otherwise please file a follow up ticket so that someone can fix it after landing this PR. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit f45a993 has been approved by |
…as-schievink Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#78641 (Let io::copy reuse BufWriter buffers) - rust-lang#79291 (Add error message for private fn) - rust-lang#81364 (Improve `rustc_mir_build::matches` docs) - rust-lang#81387 (Move some tests to more reasonable directories - 3) - rust-lang#81463 (Rename NLL* to Nll* accordingly to C-CASE) - rust-lang#81504 (Suggest accessing field when appropriate) - rust-lang#81529 (Fix invalid camel case suggestion involving unicode idents) - rust-lang#81536 (Indicate both start and end of pass RSS in time-passes output) - rust-lang#81592 (Rustdoc UI fixes) - rust-lang#81594 (Avoid building LLVM just for llvm-dwp) - rust-lang#81598 (Fix calling convention for CRT startup) - rust-lang#81618 (Sync rustc_codegen_cranelift) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
…ewording, r=estebank Improve wording of suggestion about accessing field Follow-up to rust-lang#81504 The compiler at this moment suggests "you might have meant to use field `b` of type `B`", sounding like it's type `B` which has the field `b`. r? `@estebank`
…ewording, r=estebank Improve wording of suggestion about accessing field Follow-up to rust-lang#81504 The compiler at this moment suggests "you might have meant to use field `b` of type `B`", sounding like it's type `B` which has the field `b`. r? ``@estebank``
…ewording, r=estebank Improve wording of suggestion about accessing field Follow-up to rust-lang#81504 The compiler at this moment suggests "you might have meant to use field `b` of type `B`", sounding like it's type `B` which has the field `b`. r? ```@estebank```
Fix #81222
r? @estebank