Skip to content

Add additional bitset benchmarks #81682

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2021

Conversation

JulianKnodt
Copy link
Contributor

Add additional benchmarks for operations in bitset, I realize that it was a bit lacking when I intended to optimize it earlier, so I was hoping to put some in so I can verify my work later.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @oli-obk

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 2, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job mingw-check failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
configure: rust.channel         := nightly
configure: rust.debug-assertions := True
configure: llvm.assertions      := True
configure: dist.missing-tools   := True
configure: build.configure-args := ['--enable-sccache', '--disable-manage-submodu ...
configure: writing `config.toml` in current directory
configure: 
configure: run `python /checkout/x.py --help`
configure: 
---
Checking which error codes lack tests...
Found 435 error codes
Found 0 error codes with no tests
Done!
tidy error: /checkout/compiler/rustc_index/src/bit_set/tests.rs: too many trailing newlines (2)
some tidy checks failed

command did not execute successfully: "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/tidy" "/checkout" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "/checkout/obj/build"
expected success, got: exit code: 1

@JulianKnodt JulianKnodt force-pushed the bit_set_iter_benchmarks branch from 34571c1 to 6e6608d Compare February 2, 2021 23:31
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Feb 3, 2021

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 3, 2021

📌 Commit 6e6608d has been approved by oli-obk

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 3, 2021
m-ou-se added a commit to m-ou-se/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2021
…, r=oli-obk

Add additional bitset benchmarks

Add additional benchmarks for operations in bitset, I realize that it was a bit lacking when I intended to optimize it earlier, so I was hoping to put some in so I can verify my work later.
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2021
…, r=oli-obk

Add additional bitset benchmarks

Add additional benchmarks for operations in bitset, I realize that it was a bit lacking when I intended to optimize it earlier, so I was hoping to put some in so I can verify my work later.
m-ou-se added a commit to m-ou-se/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2021
…, r=oli-obk

Add additional bitset benchmarks

Add additional benchmarks for operations in bitset, I realize that it was a bit lacking when I intended to optimize it earlier, so I was hoping to put some in so I can verify my work later.
m-ou-se added a commit to m-ou-se/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2021
…, r=oli-obk

Add additional bitset benchmarks

Add additional benchmarks for operations in bitset, I realize that it was a bit lacking when I intended to optimize it earlier, so I was hoping to put some in so I can verify my work later.
m-ou-se added a commit to m-ou-se/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2021
…, r=oli-obk

Add additional bitset benchmarks

Add additional benchmarks for operations in bitset, I realize that it was a bit lacking when I intended to optimize it earlier, so I was hoping to put some in so I can verify my work later.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2021
Rollup of 15 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#79554 (Generic associated types in trait paths)
 - rust-lang#80726 (relax adt unsizing requirements)
 - rust-lang#81307 (Handle `Span`s for byte and raw strings and add more detail )
 - rust-lang#81318 (rustdoc-json: Fix has_body)
 - rust-lang#81456 (Make remote-test-server easier to use with new targets)
 - rust-lang#81497 (rustdoc: Move `display_fn` struct inside `display_fn`)
 - rust-lang#81500 (Remove struct_type from union output)
 - rust-lang#81542 (Expose correct symlink API on WASI)
 - rust-lang#81676 (Add more information to the error code for 'crate not found')
 - rust-lang#81682 (Add additional bitset benchmarks)
 - rust-lang#81730 (Make `Allocator` object-safe)
 - rust-lang#81763 (Cleanup rustdoc pass descriptions a bit)
 - rust-lang#81767 (Update LayoutError/LayoutErr stability attributes)
 - rust-lang#81771 (Indicate change in RSS from start to end of pass in time-passes output)
 - rust-lang#81781 (Fix `install-awscli.sh` error in CI)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 21c276f into rust-lang:master Feb 5, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.51.0 milestone Feb 5, 2021
@JulianKnodt JulianKnodt deleted the bit_set_iter_benchmarks branch February 6, 2021 02:20
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants