Skip to content

remove redundant option/result wrapping of return values #82367

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 22, 2021

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

If a function always returns Ok(something), we can return something directly and remove the corresponding error handling in the callers.
clippy::unnecessary_wraps

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @petrochenkov

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 21, 2021
@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 21, 2021
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-author +S-waiting-on-review

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 21, 2021
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 22, 2021

📌 Commit da9a588 has been approved by petrochenkov

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 22, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2021
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#82098 (Add internal `collect_into_array[_unchecked]` to remove duplicate code)
 - rust-lang#82228 (Provide NonZero_c_* integers)
 - rust-lang#82287 (Make "missing field" error message more natural)
 - rust-lang#82351 (Use the first paragraph, instead of cookie-cutter text, for rustdoc descriptions)
 - rust-lang#82353 (rustdoc: Remove unnecessary `Cell` around `param_env`)
 - rust-lang#82367 (remove redundant option/result wrapping of return values)
 - rust-lang#82372 (improve UnsafeCell docs)
 - rust-lang#82379 (Fix sizes of repr(C) enums on hexagon)
 - rust-lang#82382 (rustdoc: Remove `fake_def_ids` RefCell)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 1870b3b into rust-lang:master Feb 22, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.52.0 milestone Feb 22, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2021
expand: Do not allocate `Lrc` for `allow_internal_unstable` list unless necessary

This allocation is done for any macro defined in the current crate, or used from a different crate.
EDIT: This also removes an `Lrc` increment from each *use* of such macro, which may be more significant.
Noticed when reviewing rust-lang#82367.
This probably doesn't matter, but let's do a perf run.
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the wraps branch January 25, 2025 09:13
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants