Extend proc_macro_back_compat lint to actix-web
#83179
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @estebank (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
This makes the back-compat check more restrictive, so let's do a Crater run to ensure that we're not prematurely breaking any crates: @bors try |
|
⌛ Trying commit 3c7e68acc9d409d534f78cd6e58a1a4ba6c42648 with merge c61b25cb8dc9a3b248af6d3de8dd6115c57afd3a... |
|
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
|
👌 Experiment ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more |
craterbot
added
S-waiting-on-crater
JohnTitor
reviewed
Mar 16, 2021
estebank
reviewed
Mar 17, 2021
estebank
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2021
|
🚧 Experiment ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more |
|
🎉 Experiment
|
craterbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
This broke two actori crates, as expected. There were no other regressions. |
Unlike the other cases of this lint, there's no simple way to detect if an old version of the relevant crate (`syn`) is in use. The `actix-web` crate only depends on `pin-project` v1.0.0, so checking the version of `actix-web` does not guarantee that a new enough version of `pin-project` (and therefore `syn`) is in use. Instead, we rely on the fact that virtually all of the regressed crates are pinned to a pre-1.0 version of `pin-project`. When this is the case, bumping the `actix-web` dependency will pull in the *latest* version of `pin-project`, which has an explicit dependency on a newer v dependency on a newer version of `syn`. The lint message tells users to update `actix-web`, since that's what they're most likely to have control over. We could potentially tell them to run `cargo update -p syn`, but I think it's more straightforward to suggest an explicit change to the `Cargo.toml` The `actori-web` fork had its last commit over a year ago, and appears to just be a renamed fork of `actix-web`. Therefore, I've removed the `actori-web` check entirely - any crates that actually get broken can simply update `syn` themselves.
Aaron1011
force-pushed
the
actix-web-lint
branch
from
3c7e68a to
390d1ef
Compare
|
@petrochenkov: This should now be ready to merge |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 390d1ef has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2021
…enkov Extend `proc_macro_back_compat` lint to `actix-web` Unlike the other cases of this lint, there's no simple way to detect if an old version of the relevant crate (`syn`) is in use. The `actix-web` crate only depends on `pin-project` v1.0.0, so checking the version of `actix-web` does not guarantee that a new enough version of `pin-project` (and therefore `syn`) is in use. Instead, we rely on the fact that virtually all of the regressed crates are pinned to a pre-1.0 version of `pin-project`. When this is the case, bumping the `actix-web` dependency will pull in the *latest* version of `pin-project`, which has an explicit dependency on a newer v dependency on a newer version of `syn`. The lint message tells users to update `actix-web`, since that's what they're most likely to have control over. We could potentially tell them to run `cargo update -p syn`, but I think it's more straightforward to suggest an explicit change to the `Cargo.toml` The `actori-web` fork had its last commit over a year ago, and appears to just be a renamed fork of `actix-web`. Therefore, I've removed the `actori-web` check entirely - any crates that actually get broken can simply update `syn` themselves.
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2021
…enkov Extend `proc_macro_back_compat` lint to `actix-web` Unlike the other cases of this lint, there's no simple way to detect if an old version of the relevant crate (`syn`) is in use. The `actix-web` crate only depends on `pin-project` v1.0.0, so checking the version of `actix-web` does not guarantee that a new enough version of `pin-project` (and therefore `syn`) is in use. Instead, we rely on the fact that virtually all of the regressed crates are pinned to a pre-1.0 version of `pin-project`. When this is the case, bumping the `actix-web` dependency will pull in the *latest* version of `pin-project`, which has an explicit dependency on a newer v dependency on a newer version of `syn`. The lint message tells users to update `actix-web`, since that's what they're most likely to have control over. We could potentially tell them to run `cargo update -p syn`, but I think it's more straightforward to suggest an explicit change to the `Cargo.toml` The `actori-web` fork had its last commit over a year ago, and appears to just be a renamed fork of `actix-web`. Therefore, I've removed the `actori-web` check entirely - any crates that actually get broken can simply update `syn` themselves.
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2021
…enkov Extend `proc_macro_back_compat` lint to `actix-web` Unlike the other cases of this lint, there's no simple way to detect if an old version of the relevant crate (`syn`) is in use. The `actix-web` crate only depends on `pin-project` v1.0.0, so checking the version of `actix-web` does not guarantee that a new enough version of `pin-project` (and therefore `syn`) is in use. Instead, we rely on the fact that virtually all of the regressed crates are pinned to a pre-1.0 version of `pin-project`. When this is the case, bumping the `actix-web` dependency will pull in the *latest* version of `pin-project`, which has an explicit dependency on a newer v dependency on a newer version of `syn`. The lint message tells users to update `actix-web`, since that's what they're most likely to have control over. We could potentially tell them to run `cargo update -p syn`, but I think it's more straightforward to suggest an explicit change to the `Cargo.toml` The `actori-web` fork had its last commit over a year ago, and appears to just be a renamed fork of `actix-web`. Therefore, I've removed the `actori-web` check entirely - any crates that actually get broken can simply update `syn` themselves.
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2021
…enkov Extend `proc_macro_back_compat` lint to `actix-web` Unlike the other cases of this lint, there's no simple way to detect if an old version of the relevant crate (`syn`) is in use. The `actix-web` crate only depends on `pin-project` v1.0.0, so checking the version of `actix-web` does not guarantee that a new enough version of `pin-project` (and therefore `syn`) is in use. Instead, we rely on the fact that virtually all of the regressed crates are pinned to a pre-1.0 version of `pin-project`. When this is the case, bumping the `actix-web` dependency will pull in the *latest* version of `pin-project`, which has an explicit dependency on a newer v dependency on a newer version of `syn`. The lint message tells users to update `actix-web`, since that's what they're most likely to have control over. We could potentially tell them to run `cargo update -p syn`, but I think it's more straightforward to suggest an explicit change to the `Cargo.toml` The `actori-web` fork had its last commit over a year ago, and appears to just be a renamed fork of `actix-web`. Therefore, I've removed the `actori-web` check entirely - any crates that actually get broken can simply update `syn` themselves.
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2021
…enkov Extend `proc_macro_back_compat` lint to `actix-web` Unlike the other cases of this lint, there's no simple way to detect if an old version of the relevant crate (`syn`) is in use. The `actix-web` crate only depends on `pin-project` v1.0.0, so checking the version of `actix-web` does not guarantee that a new enough version of `pin-project` (and therefore `syn`) is in use. Instead, we rely on the fact that virtually all of the regressed crates are pinned to a pre-1.0 version of `pin-project`. When this is the case, bumping the `actix-web` dependency will pull in the *latest* version of `pin-project`, which has an explicit dependency on a newer v dependency on a newer version of `syn`. The lint message tells users to update `actix-web`, since that's what they're most likely to have control over. We could potentially tell them to run `cargo update -p syn`, but I think it's more straightforward to suggest an explicit change to the `Cargo.toml` The `actori-web` fork had its last commit over a year ago, and appears to just be a renamed fork of `actix-web`. Therefore, I've removed the `actori-web` check entirely - any crates that actually get broken can simply update `syn` themselves.
This was referenced Mar 19, 2021
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2021
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#82500 (Reuse `std::sys::unsupported::pipe` on `hermit`) - rust-lang#82759 (Remove unwrap_none/expect_none from compiler/.) - rust-lang#82846 (rustdoc: allow list syntax for #[doc(alias)] attributes) - rust-lang#82892 (Clarify docs for Read::read's return value) - rust-lang#83179 (Extend `proc_macro_back_compat` lint to `actix-web`) - rust-lang#83197 (Move some test-only code to test files) - rust-lang#83208 (Fix gitattibutes for old git versions) - rust-lang#83215 (Deprecate std::os::haiku::raw, which accidentally wasn't deprecated) - rust-lang#83230 (Remove unnecessary `forward_inner_docs` hack) - rust-lang#83236 (Upgrade memmap to memmap2) - rust-lang#83270 (Fix typo/inaccuracy in the documentation of Iterator::skip_while) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Unlike the other cases of this lint, there's no simple way to detect if
an old version of the relevant crate (
syn) is in use. Theactix-webcrate only depends on
pin-projectv1.0.0, so checking the version ofactix-webdoes not guarantee that a new enough version ofpin-project(and thereforesyn) is in use.Instead, we rely on the fact that virtually all of the regressed crates
are pinned to a pre-1.0 version of
pin-project. When this is the case,bumping the
actix-webdependency will pull in the latest version ofpin-project, which has an explicit dependency on a newer v dependencyon a newer version of
syn.The lint message tells users to update
actix-web, since that's whatthey're most likely to have control over. We could potentially tell them
to run
cargo update -p syn, but I think it's more straightforward tosuggest an explicit change to the
Cargo.tomlThe
actori-webfork had its last commit over a year ago, and appearsto just be a renamed fork of
actix-web. Therefore, I've removed theactori-webcheck entirely - any crates that actually get broken cansimply update
synthemselves.