Skip to content

Support x.py doc std --open #84393

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2021
Merged

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

I usually run this command:

./x.py doc std --stage 1 --jobs 8

Then I gave a try to --open and realized it wasn't working. I finally realized it was simply because it was only handling paths starting with library. This PR allows to handle both kinds of paths.

cc @jyn514
r? @Mark-Simulacrum

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 21, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@jyn514 jyn514 added A-contributor-roadblock Area: Makes things more difficult for new or seasoned contributors to Rust T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) labels Apr 21, 2021
@jyn514 jyn514 changed the title Correctly handle --open argument on doc command Support x.py doc --open Apr 21, 2021
@jyn514 jyn514 changed the title Support x.py doc --open Support x.py doc std --open Apr 21, 2021
@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Apr 21, 2021

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 21, 2021

📌 Commit cc44ce0 has been approved by jyn514

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 21, 2021

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 21, 2021
m-ou-se added a commit to m-ou-se/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2021
…, r=jyn514

Support `x.py doc std --open`

I usually run this command:

```
./x.py doc std --stage 1 --jobs 8
```

Then I gave a try to `--open` and realized it wasn't working. I finally realized it was simply because it was only handling paths starting with `library`. This PR allows to handle both kinds of paths.

cc `@jyn514`
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2021
Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#84013 (Replace all `fmt.pad` with `debug_struct`)
 - rust-lang#84119 (Move `sys::vxworks` code to `sys::unix`)
 - rust-lang#84212 (Replace `Void` in `sys` with never type)
 - rust-lang#84251 (fix 'const-stable since' for NonZeroU*::new_unchecked)
 - rust-lang#84301 (Document that `index` and `index_mut` can panic)
 - rust-lang#84365 (Improve the docstrings of the `Lto` struct.)
 - rust-lang#84378 (Fix broken doc link)
 - rust-lang#84379 (Add GAT related tests)
 - rust-lang#84380 (Write Rustdoc titles like "x in crate::mod - Rust")
 - rust-lang#84390 (Format `Struct { .. }` on one line even with `{:#?}`.)
 - rust-lang#84393 (Support `x.py doc std --open`)
 - rust-lang#84406 (Remove `delete` alias from `mem::drop`.)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#84387 (Move `sys_common::poison` to `sync::poison`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 0749ea7 into rust-lang:master Apr 22, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.53.0 milestone Apr 22, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the better-open-handling branch April 22, 2021 08:03
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-contributor-roadblock Area: Makes things more difficult for new or seasoned contributors to Rust S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants