Skip to content

Rustdoc cleanup #85175

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 13, 2021
Merged

Rustdoc cleanup #85175

merged 3 commits into from
May 13, 2021

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez commented May 11, 2021

Part of #83332. The goal of this PR is to remove a few unused things:

  • The "loading content" things are now unneeded.
  • Some toggle CSS rules were still there.
  • Some parts of the JS had a different indent, fixed it.

r? @jsha

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez added C-cleanup Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 11, 2021
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS themes.

cc @GuillaumeGomez

A change occurred in the Ayu theme.

cc @Cldfire

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS.

cc @GuillaumeGomez

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 11, 2021
@@ -600,7 +596,6 @@ fn item_trait(w: &mut Buffer, cx: &Context<'_>, it: &clean::Item, t: &clean::Tra
for t in types {
trait_item(w, cx, t, it);
}
write_loading_content(w, "</div>");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The </div> itself still need to be there, doesn't it?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed, good catch!

Copy link
Contributor

@jsha jsha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally looks good to me, though I concur with @notriddle's observation that we still need those </divs>.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed @notriddle's comment!

@jsha
Copy link
Contributor

jsha commented May 12, 2021

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 12, 2021

📌 Commit cb91c6f has been approved by jsha

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 12, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 13, 2021
…laumeGomez

Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#85068 (Fix diagnostic for cross crate private tuple struct constructors)
 - rust-lang#85175 (Rustdoc cleanup)
 - rust-lang#85177 (add BITS associated constant to core::num::Wrapping)
 - rust-lang#85240 (Don't suggest adding `'static` lifetime to arguments)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 5aa40dd into rust-lang:master May 13, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.54.0 milestone May 13, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the rustdoc-cleanup branch May 13, 2021 20:02
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
C-cleanup Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants