Skip to content

Expose Concurrent (private type in public i'face) #85287

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2021

Conversation

eggyal
Copy link
Contributor

@eggyal eggyal commented May 14, 2021

#53410 introduced experimental support for custom test frameworks.

Such frameworks may wish to build upon library/test by calling into its publicly exposed API (which I entirely understand is wholly unstable). However, any that wish to call test::run_test cannot currently do so because test::options::Concurrent (the type of its concurrent parameter) is not publicly exposed.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @m-ou-se

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 14, 2021
@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

m-ou-se commented May 19, 2021

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 19, 2021

📌 Commit 67e8f12 has been approved by m-ou-se

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 19, 2021
@m-ou-se m-ou-se added the T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label May 19, 2021
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request May 19, 2021
…ou-se

Expose `Concurrent` (private type in public i'face)

rust-lang#53410 introduced experimental support for custom test frameworks.

Such frameworks may wish to build upon `library/test` by calling into its publicly exposed API (which I entirely understand is wholly unstable).  However, any that wish to call `test::run_test` cannot currently do so because `test::options::Concurrent` (the type of its `concurrent` parameter) is not publicly exposed.
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request May 19, 2021
…ou-se

Expose `Concurrent` (private type in public i'face)

rust-lang#53410 introduced experimental support for custom test frameworks.

Such frameworks may wish to build upon `library/test` by calling into its publicly exposed API (which I entirely understand is wholly unstable).  However, any that wish to call `test::run_test` cannot currently do so because `test::options::Concurrent` (the type of its `concurrent` parameter) is not publicly exposed.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 20, 2021
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#84717 (impl FromStr for proc_macro::Literal)
 - rust-lang#85169 (Add method-toggle to <details> for methods)
 - rust-lang#85287 (Expose `Concurrent` (private type in public i'face))
 - rust-lang#85315 (adding time complexity for partition_in_place iter method)
 - rust-lang#85439 (Add diagnostic item to `CStr`)
 - rust-lang#85464 (Fix UB in documented example for `ptr::swap`)
 - rust-lang#85470 (Fix invalid CSS rules for a:hover)
 - rust-lang#85472 (CTFE Machine: do not expose Allocation)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit a552b5b into rust-lang:master May 20, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.54.0 milestone May 20, 2021
@eggyal eggyal deleted the expose-test-concurrent branch June 28, 2022 06:14
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants