Skip to content

Remove doc(include) #85457

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 5, 2021
Merged

Remove doc(include) #85457

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 5, 2021

Conversation

jyn514
Copy link
Member

@jyn514 jyn514 commented May 19, 2021

This nightly feature is redundant now that extended_key_value_attributes is stable (#83366). @rust-lang/rustdoc not sure if you think this needs FCP; there was already an FCP in #82539, but technically it was for deprecating, not removing the feature altogether.

This should not be merged before #83366.

cc @petrochenkov

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy.

cc @rust-lang/clippy

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @estebank

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 19, 2021
Comment on lines 81 to 83
let has_doc = attrs.iter().any(|a| {
a.is_doc_comment() || a.doc_str().is_some() || a.value_str().is_some() || Self::has_include(a.meta())
a.is_doc_comment() || a.doc_str().is_some() || a.value_str().is_some()
});
Copy link
Member Author

@jyn514 jyn514 May 19, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI @rust-lang/clippy you should probably be using rustc_lint::builtin::has_doc instead; this has a false positive and also counts things like #[path = "x"] as doc-comments (because you only check value_str().is_some(), not the name of the attribute). Also in general it seems nice to have all the logic in one place.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like a nice cleanup opportunity on the Clippy side! has_doc would just have to be made public

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure thing, you could do both at the same time in a PR to rust-lang/rust :)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I opened an issue: rust-lang/rust-clippy#7247

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@jyn514 jyn514 force-pushed the remove-doc-include branch from cafde1d to 2ffb63e Compare May 19, 2021 02:08
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@jyn514 jyn514 force-pushed the remove-doc-include branch 2 times, most recently from 7f2812e to 19b8603 Compare May 19, 2021 03:33
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors

This comment has been minimized.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

This nightly feature is redundant now that extended_key_value_attributes is stable (#83366). @rust-lang/rustdoc not sure if you think this needs FCP; there was already an FCP in #82539, but technically it was for deprecating, not removing the feature altogether.

This is a nightly feature, so I'd say that the FCP is unneeded here.

@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented May 19, 2021

@GuillaumeGomez do you mind reviewing the rustdoc changes? They should be pretty simple since it's just deleted code.

Oh, I need to add a diagnostic test for suggesting doc = include_str!, let me write that up first.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Oh, I need to add a diagnostic test for suggesting doc = include_str!, let me write that up first.

Not sure this is needed though. But as you prefer. Ping me once you want me to review.

@jyn514 jyn514 force-pushed the remove-doc-include branch from ff01bd3 to 903a183 Compare May 19, 2021 19:06
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@jyn514 jyn514 force-pushed the remove-doc-include branch from 903a183 to f616e6b Compare May 19, 2021 19:18
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@jyn514 jyn514 force-pushed the remove-doc-include branch 2 times, most recently from 11c6f97 to 2a68d67 Compare May 19, 2021 19:55
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@jyn514 jyn514 force-pushed the remove-doc-include branch from 95cc6b9 to d40e9aa Compare May 20, 2021 03:30
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@jyn514 jyn514 force-pushed the remove-doc-include branch from 70a79cc to 4b5b26b Compare May 25, 2021 00:18
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors

This comment has been minimized.

@jyn514 jyn514 force-pushed the remove-doc-include branch from 4b5b26b to 15fec1f Compare June 4, 2021 12:06
@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Jun 4, 2021

@GuillaumeGomez this is ready for a second round of review

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks for this! This was a long awaited removal. :)

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 4, 2021

📌 Commit 15fec1f has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 4, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 5, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 15fec1f with merge 2c10688...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 5, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing 2c10688 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 5, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 2c10688 into rust-lang:master Jun 5, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.54.0 milestone Jun 5, 2021
@jyn514 jyn514 deleted the remove-doc-include branch June 5, 2021 12:17
russcam pushed a commit to elastic/elasticsearch-rs that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2021
doc(include) was removed in rust-lang/rust#85457.
Tests should now run on on both nightly and stable.
russcam pushed a commit to elastic/elasticsearch-rs that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2021
doc(include) was removed in rust-lang/rust#85457.
Tests should now run on on both nightly and stable.

(cherry picked from commit d96bfa2)
@jyn514 jyn514 added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jun 22, 2021
russcam pushed a commit to elastic/elasticsearch-rs that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2021
doc(include) was removed in rust-lang/rust#85457.
Tests should now run on on both nightly and stable.
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2022
Move resolve_path to rustc_builtin_macros and make it private

Fixing a FIXME introduced by `@jyn514` in rust-lang#85457
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants