Skip to content

Encode CrateNum using the StableCrateId for incr. comp. #85834

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 17, 2021

Conversation

cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @matthewjasper

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 30, 2021
@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 30, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 30, 2021

⌛ Trying commit 16f14ce3c06befe9cec6816e2b6a58116ec727d1 with merge dcfa6edd50bc82bf09cf95ed74f9333e58748b93...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 30, 2021

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: dcfa6edd50bc82bf09cf95ed74f9333e58748b93 (dcfa6edd50bc82bf09cf95ed74f9333e58748b93)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued dcfa6edd50bc82bf09cf95ed74f9333e58748b93 with parent 5957990, future comparison URL.

if *self != LOCAL_CRATE {
s.latest_foreign_def_path_hashes
.insert(def_path_hash, RawDefId { krate: self.as_u32(), index: 0 });
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this necessary?

} else {
self.cstore.stable_crate_id_untracked(cnum)
}
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This could be used in many places. I would guess it happens like 20-30 times.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking try commit (dcfa6edd50bc82bf09cf95ed74f9333e58748b93): comparison url.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying rollup- to bors.

Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 30, 2021
@bjorn3
Copy link
Member

bjorn3 commented May 31, 2021

Mixed small improvements and regressions.

@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @michaelwoerister (as a stepping stone for the odht PR)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 7, 2021

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #85891) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

It's on my todo list :)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 9, 2021

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #86150) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

Looks good to me - thanks, @cjgillot!

The performance changes are in the noise and the code is simpler than before.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 17, 2021

📌 Commit f387cff has been approved by michaelwoerister

@bors bors removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 17, 2021
@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jun 17, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 17, 2021

⌛ Testing commit f387cff with merge b17d9c1...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 17, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: michaelwoerister
Pushing b17d9c1 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 17, 2021
@bors bors merged commit b17d9c1 into rust-lang:master Jun 17, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.55.0 milestone Jun 17, 2021
@cjgillot cjgillot deleted the save-sbi branch June 17, 2021 16:55
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Jul 23, 2021
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum modified the milestones: 1.55.0, 1.54.0 Jul 23, 2021
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. and removed beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. labels Jul 23, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2021
…6368, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Backport rust-lang#85834 and rust-lang#86368

As per discussion in https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/backport.20.2386368, backporting rust-lang#85834 too seems like the safest option for cleanly backporting rust-lang#86368.

r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants