Skip to content

Fix small headers display #86903

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2021
Merged

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez commented Jul 6, 2021

You can see it on the IoSlice or on the ErrorKind pages.

Before:

Screenshot from 2021-07-06 15-26-33
Screenshot from 2021-07-08 17-51-43

After:

Screenshot from 2021-07-08 17-48-42
Screenshot from 2021-07-08 17-48-47

r? @Nemo157

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez added T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. A-rustdoc-ui Area: Rustdoc UI (generated HTML) labels Jul 6, 2021
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS.

cc @GuillaumeGomez

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 6, 2021
@Nemo157
Copy link
Member

Nemo157 commented Jul 7, 2021

This would break the display of the stabilized versions on enum variants, if they weren't already broken from being display: block instead of display: flex (e.g. https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/io/enum.ErrorKind.html#variant.OutOfMemory, disabling the display: block rule fixes the version to appear on the right, but then disabling this justify-content: space-between rule breaks it to be left-aligned again).

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Good catch, thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 8, 2021

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #86966) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Simply wrapping the section content into a span fixes the problem. Making more tests locally.

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez force-pushed the small-header-display branch from f40a310 to 1f84bff Compare July 8, 2021 15:49
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

It's now ready @Nemo157. :)

@Nemo157
Copy link
Member

Nemo157 commented Jul 8, 2021

Seems likely to fix it all

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 8, 2021

📌 Commit 1f84bff has been approved by Nemo157

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 8, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2021
…laumeGomez

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#84961 (Rework SESSION_GLOBALS API)
 - rust-lang#86726 (Use diagnostic items instead of lang items for rfc2229 migrations)
 - rust-lang#86789 (Update BTreeSet::drain_filter documentation)
 - rust-lang#86838 (Checking that function is const if marked with rustc_const_unstable)
 - rust-lang#86903 (Fix small headers display)
 - rust-lang#86913 (Document rustdoc with `--document-private-items`)
 - rust-lang#86957 (Update .mailmap file)
 - rust-lang#86971 (mailmap: Add alternative addresses for myself)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#86869 (Account for capture kind in auto traits migration)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 46314f7 into rust-lang:master Jul 8, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.55.0 milestone Jul 8, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the small-header-display branch July 8, 2021 20:24
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-rustdoc-ui Area: Rustdoc UI (generated HTML) S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants