Skip to content

DOC: fix hypothetical Rust code in step_by() docstring #87034

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2021

Conversation

mgeier
Copy link
Contributor

@mgeier mgeier commented Jul 10, 2021

I don't know how important that is, but if I'm not mistaken, the hypothetical code in the docstring of step_by() (see https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/trait.Iterator.html#method.step_by) isn't correct.

I guess writing next() instead of self.next() isn't a biggie, but this would also imply that advance_n_and_return_first() is a method, which AFAICT it isn't.

I've also done some re-formatting in a separate commit and a parameter renaming in yet another commit.

Feel free to take or leave any combination of those commits.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @kennytm

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 10, 2021
@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

I guess it's simplified but agree that the proposed change is more accurate. Could you squash commits into one? They're trivial.

@JohnTitor JohnTitor assigned JohnTitor and unassigned kennytm Jul 13, 2021
@JohnTitor JohnTitor added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 13, 2021
@mgeier
Copy link
Contributor Author

mgeier commented Jul 14, 2021

Could you squash commits into one?

Done.

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Sorry for the delay, thanks for the PR!
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 23, 2021

📌 Commit 46abc12 has been approved by JohnTitor

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jul 23, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2021
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#87034 (DOC: fix hypothetical Rust code in `step_by()` docstring)
 - rust-lang#87298 (memorialize Anna Harren in the bastion of the turbofish)
 - rust-lang#87332 (Don't hide fields of enum struct variants)
 - rust-lang#87362 (Make `x.py d` an alias for `x.py doc`)
 - rust-lang#87372 (Move calls to test_main into one function)
 - rust-lang#87373 (Extend HIR WF checking to fields)
 - rust-lang#87376 (Change rustdoc logo to use the full container size)
 - rust-lang#87383 (Add regression tests for the impl_trait_in_bindings ICEs)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit ba6957c into rust-lang:master Jul 23, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.55.0 milestone Jul 23, 2021
@mgeier mgeier deleted the doc-step_by branch July 23, 2021 15:44
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants