expand: Treat more macro calls as statement macro calls #88428
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit d7da82a has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2021
expand: Treat more macro calls as statement macro calls This PR implements the suggestion from rust-lang#87981 (comment) and treats fn-like macro calls inside `StmtKind::Item` and `StmtKind::Semi` as statement macro calls, which is consistent with treatment of attribute invocations in the same positions and with token-based macro expansion model in general. This also allows to remove a special case in `NodeId` assignment (previously tried in rust-lang#87779), and to use statement `NodeId`s for linting (`assign_id!`). r? `@Aaron1011`
|
Is it the one failing in #88584? |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
@bors r=Aaron1011 |
|
📌 Commit 9940758 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
m-ou-se
added a commit
to m-ou-se/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2021
expand: Treat more macro calls as statement macro calls This PR implements the suggestion from rust-lang#87981 (comment) and treats fn-like macro calls inside `StmtKind::Item` and `StmtKind::Semi` as statement macro calls, which is consistent with treatment of attribute invocations in the same positions and with token-based macro expansion model in general. This also allows to remove a special case in `NodeId` assignment (previously tried in rust-lang#87779), and to use statement `NodeId`s for linting (`assign_id!`). r? `@Aaron1011`
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR implements the suggestion from #87981 (comment) and treats fn-like macro calls inside
StmtKind::ItemandStmtKind::Semias statement macro calls, which is consistent with treatment of attribute invocations in the same positions and with token-based macro expansion model in general.This also allows to remove a special case in
NodeIdassignment (previously tried in #87779), and to use statementNodeIds for linting (assign_id!).r? @Aaron1011