Skip to content

Deprecate array::IntoIter::new. #88611

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 5, 2021

Conversation

m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

@m-ou-se m-ou-se commented Sep 3, 2021

No description provided.

@m-ou-se m-ou-se added T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. A-edition-2021 Area: The 2021 edition labels Sep 3, 2021
@m-ou-se m-ou-se self-assigned this Sep 3, 2021
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 3, 2021
@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member Author

m-ou-se commented Sep 3, 2021

Since Rust 1.53, IntoIterator::into_iter([1, 2, 3]) works (on all editions), so array::IntoIter::new is no longer needed.

@rfcbot merge

@rfcbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rfcbot commented Sep 3, 2021

Team member @m-ou-se has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members:

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@rfcbot rfcbot added proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. labels Sep 3, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@m-ou-se m-ou-se force-pushed the array-into-iter-new-deprecate branch from 86b19bf to c5aa649 Compare September 3, 2021 10:52
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@m-ou-se m-ou-se force-pushed the array-into-iter-new-deprecate branch from c5aa649 to 11af9f0 Compare September 3, 2021 11:01
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 3, 2021

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #88618) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@rfcbot rfcbot added the final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. label Sep 4, 2021
@rfcbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rfcbot commented Sep 4, 2021

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

@rfcbot rfcbot removed the proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. label Sep 4, 2021
@rfcbot rfcbot added the finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. label Sep 14, 2021
@rfcbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rfcbot commented Sep 14, 2021

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed.

The RFC will be merged soon.

@rfcbot rfcbot added to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting and removed final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. labels Sep 14, 2021
@apiraino apiraino removed the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Sep 16, 2021
@JohnCSimon JohnCSimon added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 3, 2021
@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

This looks ready to merge once the merge conflicts are fixed.

@camelid camelid added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 5, 2021
@JohnCSimon JohnCSimon removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Oct 24, 2021
@JohnCSimon JohnCSimon added the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Oct 24, 2021
@JohnCSimon JohnCSimon added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Nov 13, 2021
@m-ou-se m-ou-se force-pushed the array-into-iter-new-deprecate branch from 11af9f0 to eb3fc45 Compare December 4, 2021 18:40
@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member Author

m-ou-se commented Dec 5, 2021

@bors r=joshtriplett

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 5, 2021

📌 Commit 27d3935 has been approved by joshtriplett

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Dec 5, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 5, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 27d3935 with merge 1597728...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 5, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: joshtriplett
Pushing 1597728 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 5, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 1597728 into rust-lang:master Dec 5, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.59.0 milestone Dec 5, 2021
@m-ou-se m-ou-se deleted the array-into-iter-new-deprecate branch December 5, 2021 17:32
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (1597728): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-edition-2021 Area: The 2021 edition disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.