Skip to content

Add long explanation for error E0482 #89710

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 12, 2021
Merged

Add long explanation for error E0482 #89710

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 12, 2021

Conversation

sireliah
Copy link
Contributor

@sireliah sireliah commented Oct 9, 2021

This is longer explanation for error E0482 in the #61137.

Please take a look and leave some feedback!

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Some changes occurred in diagnostic error codes

cc @GuillaumeGomez

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @nagisa (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 9, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

}
```

[`impl Trait`] feature in return type have implicit `'static` lifetime
Copy link
Member

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez Oct 10, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
[`impl Trait`] feature in return type have implicit `'static` lifetime
The [`impl Trait`] feature uses an implicit `'static` lifetime restriction in the returned type

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I fixed that part and split the sentence in two. I also made it sound different, because before the explanation sounded like all -> impl Trait structures force 'static lifetime in all cases (like Box<Trait>), which is not true according to RFC I believe.

Those can be different lifetimes and only my example required 'static. Please correct me if I'm wrong @GuillaumeGomez or @nagisa.

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ use regex::Regex;
// A few of those error codes can't be tested but all the others can and *should* be tested!
const EXEMPTED_FROM_TEST: &[&str] = &[
"E0227", "E0279", "E0280", "E0313", "E0377", "E0461", "E0462", "E0464", "E0465", "E0476",
"E0482", "E0514", "E0519", "E0523", "E0554", "E0640", "E0717", "E0729",
"E0514", "E0519", "E0523", "E0554", "E0640", "E0717", "E0729",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Oct 10, 2021

r? @GuillaumeGomez

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Once these are done, I think it'll be good to be merged.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 11, 2021

📌 Commit 0fde6f6 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 11, 2021
@sireliah
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review @GuillaumeGomez!

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2021
…askrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#89471 (Use Ancestory to check default fn in const impl instead of comparing idents)
 - rust-lang#89643 (Fix inherent impl overlap check.)
 - rust-lang#89651 (Add `Poll::ready` and revert stabilization of `task::ready!`)
 - rust-lang#89675 (Re-use TypeChecker instead of passing around some of its fields )
 - rust-lang#89710 (Add long explanation for error E0482)
 - rust-lang#89756 (Greatly reduce amount of debuginfo compiled for bootstrap itself)
 - rust-lang#89760 (Remove hack ignoring unused attributes for stage 0 std)
 - rust-lang#89772 (Fix function-names test for GDB 10.1)
 - rust-lang#89785 (Fix ICE when compiling nightly std/rustc on beta compiler)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 57504aa into rust-lang:master Oct 12, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.57.0 milestone Oct 12, 2021
@sireliah sireliah deleted the e0482 branch October 12, 2021 10:43
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants