Skip to content

Make Option::expect unstably const #90269

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Make Option::expect unstably const #90269

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

lilasta
Copy link
Contributor

@lilasta lilasta commented Oct 25, 2021

Tracking issue: #67441

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @yaahc

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 25, 2021
@jyn514 jyn514 changed the title Make Option::expect const Make Option::expect unstably const Oct 27, 2021
@apiraino apiraino added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Oct 28, 2021
@JohnCSimon JohnCSimon added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 16, 2021
@yaahc
Copy link
Member

yaahc commented Dec 2, 2021

LGTM, thank you!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 2, 2021

📌 Commit 7430b22 has been approved by yaahc

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 2, 2021
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2021
Make `Option::expect` unstably const

Tracking issue: rust-lang#67441
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2021
Make `Option::expect` unstably const

Tracking issue: rust-lang#67441
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2021
…askrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#88906 (Implement write() method for Box<MaybeUninit<T>>)
 - rust-lang#90269 (Make `Option::expect` unstably const)
 - rust-lang#90854 (Type can be unsized and uninhabited)
 - rust-lang#91170 (rustdoc: preload fonts)
 - rust-lang#91273 (Fix ICE rust-lang#91268 by checking that the snippet ends with a `)`)
 - rust-lang#91381 (Android: -ldl must appear after -lgcc when linking)
 - rust-lang#91453 (Document Windows TLS drop behaviour)
 - rust-lang#91462 (Use try_normalize_erasing_regions in needs_drop)
 - rust-lang#91474 (suppress warning about set_errno being unused on DragonFly)
 - rust-lang#91483 (Sync rustfmt subtree)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 3, 2021

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #91486) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Dec 3, 2021
@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

This has been merged into master by bors (in #91486), but GitHub didn't detect it for whatever reason. Closing.

@lilasta lilasta deleted the const_option_expect branch December 3, 2021 13:06
yvt added a commit to r3-os/r3 that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2021
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants