Skip to content

Improve rustdoc-gui CI #91181

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 26, 2021
Merged

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez commented Nov 24, 2021

As commented here:

When the text isn't displayed, the color returned by puppeteer is always rgba(0,0,0,0), which is definitely not the right value. To prevent this error from happening again, browser-ui-test will now fail if a CSS color check is run when the text isn't displayed.

Either this PR or #91179 is merged first, they'll conflict because I made changes to the same test file.

cc @jyn514
r? @jsha

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Nov 24, 2021
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 24, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 25, 2021

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #91203) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Copy link
Contributor

@jsha jsha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the fix, this is great! r=me after rebase and tests passing.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r=jsha

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 25, 2021

📌 Commit e340478 has been approved by jsha

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 25, 2021
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2021
…ci, r=jsha

Improve rustdoc-gui CI

As commented [here](rust-lang#91179 (comment)):

When the text isn't displayed, the color returned by puppeteer is always `rgba(0,0,0,0)`, which is definitely not the right value. To prevent this error from happening again, `browser-ui-test` will now fail if a CSS color check is run when the text isn't displayed.

Either this PR or rust-lang#91179 is merged first, they'll conflict because I made changes to the same test file.

cc `@jyn514`
r? `@jsha`
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2021
…ci, r=jsha

Improve rustdoc-gui CI

As commented [here](rust-lang#91179 (comment)):

When the text isn't displayed, the color returned by puppeteer is always `rgba(0,0,0,0)`, which is definitely not the right value. To prevent this error from happening again, `browser-ui-test` will now fail if a CSS color check is run when the text isn't displayed.

Either this PR or rust-lang#91179 is merged first, they'll conflict because I made changes to the same test file.

cc ``@jyn514``
r? ``@jsha``
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2021
…ci, r=jsha

Improve rustdoc-gui CI

As commented [here](rust-lang#91179 (comment)):

When the text isn't displayed, the color returned by puppeteer is always `rgba(0,0,0,0)`, which is definitely not the right value. To prevent this error from happening again, `browser-ui-test` will now fail if a CSS color check is run when the text isn't displayed.

Either this PR or rust-lang#91179 is merged first, they'll conflict because I made changes to the same test file.

cc ```@jyn514```
r? ```@jsha```
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 26, 2021

⌛ Testing commit e340478 with merge a7836bf...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 26, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jsha
Pushing a7836bf to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 26, 2021
@bors bors merged commit a7836bf into rust-lang:master Nov 26, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.58.0 milestone Nov 26, 2021
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a7836bf): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the improve-rustdoc-gui-ci branch November 26, 2021 20:03
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants