Skip to content

Simplify --no-headless option for rustdoc-gui tester #91391

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2021

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

It adds a message stating the change for the concurrency and also remove the extra condition when running the tests.

r? @camelid

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Nov 30, 2021
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 30, 2021
@camelid
Copy link
Member

camelid commented Nov 30, 2021

Sorry, I'm not familiar with the GUI tester.

r? @jsha

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned jsha and unassigned camelid Nov 30, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

r? @notriddle

@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not very familiar with how this tool works, either.

@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

r? @jsha

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

I'm not sure if @jsha is either. Oh well, we'll see. :)

@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

BTW, this does seem like a reasonable change to me. If you're using a "headed" browser, running more than one test at a time can create window-manager-related bugs, and nobody wants to deal with that.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

It was actually already the case, I simply added some log about it and unified the code a bit more.

@jsha
Copy link
Contributor

jsha commented Dec 1, 2021

I'm okay reviewing this. I've looked a little bit at the GUI tester and have done some Node before.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Don't hesitate if you have questions then!

@jsha
Copy link
Contributor

jsha commented Dec 5, 2021

@bors r+ rollup

Looks good! One comment on variable naming, which doesn't block merging:

} else if (!no_headless) {

When I see a statement like this I read it as "not no headless", which is a double negative and kind of confusing. Instead you can name the variable headless and invert the sense:

let headless = true;
...
        if (opts["no_headless"]) {
            args.push("--no-headless");
            headless = false;
        }

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 5, 2021

📌 Commit 1feeda8 has been approved by jsha

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 5, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2021
…askrgr

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#91367 (Fix ICE in `check_must_not_suspend_ty()`)
 - rust-lang#91391 (Simplify --no-headless option for rustdoc-gui tester)
 - rust-lang#91537 (compiler/rustc_target: make m68k-unknown-linux-gnu use the gnu base)
 - rust-lang#91554 (Update doc about code block edition attributes)
 - rust-lang#91563 (Bump download-ci-llvm-stamp for LLD inclusion)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 9c777fc into rust-lang:master Dec 6, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.59.0 milestone Dec 6, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the simplify-no-headless branch December 6, 2021 09:19
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2021
…tester-code, r=jsha

Improve code for rustdoc-gui tester

Following advice given in rust-lang#91391.

It nicely improves the code readability. :)

r? `@jsha`
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants