Skip to content

Rollup of 6 pull requests #91799

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
Dec 11, 2021
Merged

Rollup of 6 pull requests #91799

merged 34 commits into from
Dec 11, 2021

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

mbartlett21 and others added 30 commits November 10, 2021 08:41
This commit also updates `stdarch` git submodule.
This is a follow-up from rust-lang#91645, regarding [some remarks I made](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/187312-wg-async-foundations/topic/join!/near/264293660).

Mainly:
  - it hides the recursive munching through a private `macro`, to avoid leaking such details (a corollary is getting rid of the need to use `@` to disambiguate);
  - it uses a `match` binding, _outside_ the `async move` block, to better match the semantics from function-like syntax;
  - it pre-pins the future before calling into `poll_fn`, since `poll_fn`, alone, cannot guarantee that its capture does not move;
  - it uses `.ready()?` since it's such a neat pattern;
  - it renames `Took` to `Taken` for consistency with `Done`.
Co-Authored-By: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibrah1440@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibrah1440@gmail.com>
…` point

```
error[E0759]: `self` has an anonymous lifetime `'_` but it needs to satisfy a `'static` lifetime requirement
  --> $DIR/issue-72312.rs:10:24
   |
LL |     pub async fn start(&self) {
   |                        ^^^^^ this data with an anonymous lifetime `'_`...
...
LL |         require_static(async move {
   |         -------------- ...is required to live as long as `'static` here...
LL |             &self;
   |             ----- ...and is captured here
   |
note: `'static` lifetime requirement introduced by this trait bound
  --> $DIR/issue-72312.rs:2:22
   |
LL | fn require_static<T: 'static>(val: T) -> T {
   |                      ^^^^^^^

error: aborting due to previous error

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0759`.
```

Fix rust-lang#72312.
* take diagnostic logic out of happy-path
* sort/dedup once
* add more comments
More accurate filtering still needed.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Henry-Mantilla <daniel.henry.mantilla@gmail.com>
In Rust, nesting method calls with both require `&mut` access to `self`
produces a borrow-check error:

    error[E0499]: cannot borrow `*self` as mutable more than once at a time
     --> src/lib.rs:7:14
      |
    7 |     self.foo(self.bar());
      |     ---------^^^^^^^^^^-
      |     |    |   |
      |     |    |   second mutable borrow occurs here
      |     |    first borrow later used by call
      |     first mutable borrow occurs here

That's because Rust has a left-to-right evaluation order, and the method
receiver is passed first. Thus, the argument to the method cannot then
mutate `self`.

There's an easy solution to this error: just extract a local variable
for the inner argument:

    let tmp = self.bar();
    self.foo(tmp);

However, the error doesn't give any suggestion of how to solve the
problem. As a result, new users may assume that it's impossible to
express their code correctly and get stuck.

This commit adds a (non-structured) suggestion to extract a local
variable for the inner argument to solve the error. The suggestion uses
heuristics that eliminate most false positives, though there are a few
false negatives (cases where the suggestion should be emitted but is
not). Those other cases can be implemented in a future change.
Suggest using a temporary variable to fix borrowck errors

Fixes rust-lang#77834.

In Rust, nesting method calls with both require `&mut` access to `self`
produces a borrow-check error:

    error[E0499]: cannot borrow `*self` as mutable more than once at a time
     --> src/lib.rs:7:14
      |
    7 |     self.foo(self.bar());
      |     ---------^^^^^^^^^^-
      |     |    |   |
      |     |    |   second mutable borrow occurs here
      |     |    first borrow later used by call
      |     first mutable borrow occurs here

That's because Rust has a left-to-right evaluation order, and the method
receiver is passed first. Thus, the argument to the method cannot then
mutate `self`.

There's an easy solution to this error: just extract a local variable
for the inner argument:

    let tmp = self.bar();
    self.foo(tmp);

However, the error doesn't give any suggestion of how to solve the
problem. As a result, new users may assume that it's impossible to
express their code correctly and get stuck.

This commit adds a (non-structured) suggestion to extract a local
variable for the inner argument to solve the error. The suggestion uses
heuristics that eliminate most false positives, though there are a few
false negatives (cases where the suggestion should be emitted but is
not). Those other cases can be implemented in a future change.
Point at capture points for non-`'static` reference crossing a `yield` point

```
error[E0759]: `self` has an anonymous lifetime `'_` but it needs to satisfy a `'static` lifetime requirement
  --> $DIR/issue-72312.rs:10:24
   |
LL |     pub async fn start(&self) {
   |                        ^^^^^ this data with an anonymous lifetime `'_`...
...
LL |         require_static(async move {
   |         -------------- ...is required to live as long as `'static` here...
LL |             &self;
   |             ----- ...and is captured here
   |
note: `'static` lifetime requirement introduced by this trait bound
  --> $DIR/issue-72312.rs:2:22
   |
LL | fn require_static<T: 'static>(val: T) -> T {
   |                      ^^^^^^^

error: aborting due to previous error

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0759`.
```

Fix rust-lang#72312.
Make `Borrow` and `BorrowMut` impls `const`

Tracking issue: rust-lang#91522
Const `Option::cloned`

This constifies the two `Option::cloned` functions, bounded on `~const Clone`.
…anieu

Add spin_loop hint for RISC-V architecture

This commit uses the PAUSE instruction (rust-lang/stdarch#1262) to implement RISC-V spin loop, and updates `stdarch` submodule to use the merged PAUSE instruction.
…triplett

Minor improvements to `future::join!`'s implementation

This is a follow-up from rust-lang#91645, regarding [some remarks I made](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/187312-wg-async-foundations/topic/join!/near/264293660).

Mainly:
  - it hides the recursive munching through a private `macro`, to avoid leaking such details (a corollary is getting rid of the need to use ``@`` to disambiguate);
  - it uses a `match` binding, _outside_ the `async move` block, to better match the semantics from function-like syntax;
  - it pre-pins the future before calling into `poll_fn`, since `poll_fn`, alone, cannot guarantee that its capture does not move (to clarify: I believe the previous code was sound, thanks to the outer layer of `async`. But I find it clearer / more robust to refactorings this way 🙂).
  - it uses `@ibraheemdev's` very neat `.ready()?`;
  - it renames `Took` to `Taken` for consistency with `Done` (tiny nit 😄).

~~TODO~~Done:

  - [x] Add unit tests to enforce the function-like `:value` semantics are respected.

r? `@nrc`
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Dec 11, 2021
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=6

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 11, 2021

📌 Commit ed81098 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Dec 11, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 11, 2021

⌛ Testing commit ed81098 with merge 928783d...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 11, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 928783d to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 11, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 928783d into rust-lang:master Dec 11, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.59.0 milestone Dec 11, 2021
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (928783d): comparison url.

Summary: This change led to very large relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.

  • Very large improvement in instruction counts (up to -5.9% on incr-unchanged builds of inflate)
  • Small regression in instruction counts (up to 0.8% on incr-unchanged builds of issue-88862)

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Dec 11, 2021
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-b38xx6i branch December 12, 2021 09:58
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.