-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
miri: lift restriction on extern types being the only field in a struct #91910
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some changes occured to the CTFE / Miri engine cc @rust-lang/miri |
RalfJung
reviewed
Dec 15, 2021
fn main() { | ||
assert_eq!(A_REF.as_slice(), &[5, 6, 7]); | ||
// Check that interpreter and code generation agree about the position of the tail field. | ||
assert_eq!(A_TAIL_OFFSET, tail_offset(A_REF)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice test. :)
I wonder if there are corner cases that make it more challenging, like newtype-wrapping Opaque
in a repr(align)
type to ensure it has alignment larger than usize
?
d26a329
to
7b65bb9
Compare
RalfJung
reviewed
Dec 15, 2021
RalfJung
reviewed
Dec 15, 2021
RalfJung
reviewed
Dec 15, 2021
7b65bb9
to
fd47d24
Compare
Thanks! |
📌 Commit fd47d24 has been approved by |
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2021
miri: lift restriction on extern types being the only field in a struct Fixes rust-lang#91827. r? `@RalfJung`
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2021
miri: lift restriction on extern types being the only field in a struct Fixes rust-lang#91827. r? ``@RalfJung``
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2021
miri: lift restriction on extern types being the only field in a struct Fixes rust-lang#91827. r? ```@RalfJung```
This was referenced Dec 17, 2021
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2021
…askrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#87901 (Fix suggestion of additional `pub` when using `pub pub fn ...`) - rust-lang#89090 (Lint bare traits in AstConv.) - rust-lang#91818 (Show the unused type for `unused_results` lint) - rust-lang#91910 (miri: lift restriction on extern types being the only field in a struct) - rust-lang#91928 (Constify (most) `Option` methods) - rust-lang#91975 (Move generator check earlier in inlining.) - rust-lang#92016 (builtin_macros: allow external consumers for AsmArgs parsing) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #91827.
r? @RalfJung