Skip to content

⬆️ rust-analyzer #92583

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2022
Merged

Conversation

lnicola
Copy link
Member

@lnicola lnicola commented Jan 5, 2022

r? @ghost

@lnicola
Copy link
Member Author

lnicola commented Jan 5, 2022

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 5, 2022

📌 Commit 2687a93 has been approved by lnicola

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jan 5, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#92092 (Drop guards in slice sorting derive src pointers from &mut T, which is invalidated by interior mutation in comparison)
 - rust-lang#92388 (Fix a minor mistake in `String::try_reserve_exact` examples)
 - rust-lang#92442 (Add negative `impl` for `Ord`, `PartialOrd` on `LocalDefId`)
 - rust-lang#92483 (Stabilize `result_cloned` and `result_copied`)
 - rust-lang#92574 (Add RISC-V detection macro and more architecture instructions)
 - rust-lang#92575 (ast: Always keep a `NodeId` in `ast::Crate`)
 - rust-lang#92583 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 439a125 into rust-lang:master Jan 5, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.59.0 milestone Jan 5, 2022
@lnicola lnicola deleted the rust-analyzer-2022-01-05 branch January 5, 2022 18:47
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants