Skip to content

More let_else adoptions #93590

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2022
Merged

More let_else adoptions #93590

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2022

Conversation

est31
Copy link
Member

@est31 est31 commented Feb 2, 2022

Continuation of #89933, #91018, #91481, #93046.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Feb 2, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @lcnr

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 2, 2022
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Feb 2, 2022

@bors r+ rollup

after seeing let_else a lot more, I have to admit i still think it's somewhat difficult to read, even after using it myself.
It definitely improves the general readability of the code and i can't really think of any sensible alternative though 😅

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 2, 2022

📌 Commit 670f5c6 has been approved by lcnr

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 2, 2022
@@ -217,85 +217,81 @@ where
let mut issue_num = None;
let mut is_soft = false;
for meta in metas {
if let Some(mi) = meta.meta_item() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code is being refactored in #93017. Does c271373db4a58920c2a9629cebaab321b3e2ca57 need to use more let-else?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It still has a diverging block in the else case, so your refactored code can still benefit from let else adoption. But I can remove it here so that it doesn't cause conflicts. Does that sound like a plan to you?

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#92528 (Make `Fingerprint::combine_commutative` associative)
 - rust-lang#93221 ([borrowck] Fix help on mutating &self in async fns)
 - rust-lang#93542 (Prevent lifetime elision in type alias)
 - rust-lang#93546 (Validate that values in switch int terminator are unique)
 - rust-lang#93571 (better suggestion for duplicated `where` clause)
 - rust-lang#93574 (don't suggest adding `let` due to bad assignment expressions inside of `while` loop)
 - rust-lang#93590 (More let_else adoptions)
 - rust-lang#93592 (Remove unused dep from rustc_arena)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 3388e6d into rust-lang:master Feb 2, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.60.0 milestone Feb 2, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2022
Adopt let else in more places

Continuation of rust-lang#89933, rust-lang#91018, rust-lang#91481, rust-lang#93046, rust-lang#93590, rust-lang#94011.

I have extended my clippy lint to also recognize tuple passing and match statements. The diff caused by fixing it is way above 1 thousand lines. Thus, I split it up into multiple pull requests to make reviewing easier. This is the biggest of these PRs and handles the changes outside of rustdoc, rustc_typeck, rustc_const_eval, rustc_trait_selection, which were handled in PRs rust-lang#94139, rust-lang#94142, rust-lang#94143, rust-lang#94144.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2022
rustc_typeck: adopt let else in more places

Continuation of rust-lang#89933, rust-lang#91018, rust-lang#91481, rust-lang#93046, rust-lang#93590, rust-lang#94011.

I have extended my clippy lint to also recognize tuple passing and match statements. The diff caused by fixing it is way above 1 thousand lines. Thus, I split it up into multiple pull requests to make reviewing easier. This PR handles rustc_typeck.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2022
Adopt let else in more places

Continuation of rust-lang#89933, rust-lang#91018, rust-lang#91481, rust-lang#93046, rust-lang#93590, rust-lang#94011.

I have extended my clippy lint to also recognize tuple passing and match statements. The diff caused by fixing it is way above 1 thousand lines. Thus, I split it up into multiple pull requests to make reviewing easier. This is the biggest of these PRs and handles the changes outside of rustdoc, rustc_typeck, rustc_const_eval, rustc_trait_selection, which were handled in PRs rust-lang#94139, rust-lang#94142, rust-lang#94143, rust-lang#94144.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2022
rustc_const_eval: adopt let else in more places

Continuation of rust-lang#89933, rust-lang#91018, rust-lang#91481, rust-lang#93046, rust-lang#93590, rust-lang#94011.

I have extended my clippy lint to also recognize tuple passing and match statements. The diff caused by fixing it is way above 1 thousand lines. Thus, I split it up into multiple pull requests to make reviewing easier. This PR handles rustc_const_eval.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2022
…jgillot

rustc_trait_selection: adopt let else in more places

Continuation of rust-lang#89933, rust-lang#91018, rust-lang#91481, rust-lang#93046, rust-lang#93590, rust-lang#94011.

I have extended my clippy lint to also recognize tuple passing and match statements. The diff caused by fixing it is way above 1 thousand lines. Thus, I split it up into multiple pull requests to make reviewing easier. This PR handles rustc_trait_selection.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2022
…illot

rustc_trait_selection: adopt let else in more places

Continuation of rust-lang#89933, rust-lang#91018, rust-lang#91481, rust-lang#93046, rust-lang#93590, rust-lang#94011.

I have extended my clippy lint to also recognize tuple passing and match statements. The diff caused by fixing it is way above 1 thousand lines. Thus, I split it up into multiple pull requests to make reviewing easier. This PR handles rustc_trait_selection.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2022
librustdoc: adopt let else in more places

Continuation of rust-lang#89933, rust-lang#91018, rust-lang#91481, rust-lang#93046, rust-lang#93590, rust-lang#94011.

I have extended my clippy lint to also recognize tuple passing and match statements. The diff caused by fixing it is way above 1 thousand lines. Thus, I split it up into multiple pull requests to make reviewing easier. This PR handles librustdoc.
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants