-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
Update browser-ui-test version #93597
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 1dbdfc4 has been approved by |
…st, r=jsha Update browser-ui-test version The puppeteer version update is limited because new versions has some "interesting" flaws. r? `@jsha`
…st, r=jsha Update browser-ui-test version The puppeteer version update is limited because new versions has some "interesting" flaws. r? ``@jsha``
Hmmh, I think this might be responsible for this rollup failure / rustdoc test failure: |
@matthiaskrgr I doesn't seem related. We can keep it out of rollups if you prefer though. @bors: r=jsha |
📌 Commit 1dbdfc4 has been approved by |
…st, r=jsha Update browser-ui-test version The puppeteer version update is limited because new versions has some "interesting" flaws. r? `@jsha`
@bors rollup=never another rollup attempt failed, let's see |
@bors r- This PR is definitely the cause of the errors, it fails when rebased:
|
1dbdfc4
to
1433b95
Compare
010619b
to
ef00e3b
Compare
I updated a comment in a GUI test to ensure ahead of time that the test isn't failing before r+ing again. |
Seems like GUI tests passed so let's go! @bors: r+ |
📌 Commit ef00e3b has been approved by |
Arf forgot... @bors: r=jsha |
💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.
|
📌 Commit ef00e3b has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (291bf94): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
The puppeteer version update is limited because new versions has some "interesting" flaws.
r? @jsha