Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Add regression tests for issue 80309 #93649

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 6, 2022

Conversation

WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

Closes #80309 😝

I'm not sure where to put the tests, is ui/issues the right place for this kind of tests?

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Feb 4, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 4, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Feb 4, 2022

Tidy is unhappy, maybe put it in a new folder like src/test/ui/ptr_ops

r? @oli-obk

@WaffleLapkin WaffleLapkin force-pushed the regression_test_80309 branch from 354cd68 to 8e99d92 Compare February 4, 2022 15:47
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Feb 4, 2022

Uh oh. Looks like this is still happening... maybe CI has a different llvm? brb reading some diffs

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Feb 4, 2022

I guess CI being x86_64-gnu-llvm-12 should've been a hint.

@rust-lang/wg-llvm should we wait until CI is bumped or can we ignore the tests on an old llvm somehow?

@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Feb 4, 2022

// min-llvm-version

@oli-obk oli-obk added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 4, 2022
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Feb 4, 2022

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 4, 2022

📌 Commit a3b1bc1 has been approved by oli-obk

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 4, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2022
… r=oli-obk

Add regression tests for issue 80309

Closes rust-lang#80309 😝

I'm not sure where to put the tests, is `ui/issues` the right place for this kind of tests?
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#91939 (Clarify error on casting larger integers to char)
 - rust-lang#92300 (mips64-openwrt-linux-musl: Add Tier 3 target)
 - rust-lang#92383 (Add new target armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabi (softfloat))
 - rust-lang#92651 (Remove "up here" arrow on item-infos)
 - rust-lang#93556 (Change struct expr pretty printing to match rustfmt style)
 - rust-lang#93649 (Add regression tests for issue 80309)
 - rust-lang#93657 (Update CPU idle tracking for apple hosts)
 - rust-lang#93659 (Refactor conditional)
 - rust-lang#93669 (Resolve lifetimes for const generic defaults)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 520bd35 into rust-lang:master Feb 6, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.60.0 milestone Feb 6, 2022
@WaffleLapkin WaffleLapkin deleted the regression_test_80309 branch February 6, 2025 21:43
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Miscompilation when using wrapping_sub/wrapping_add on pointer.
8 participants