Skip to content

add fut/back compat tests for implied trait bounds #93732

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 9, 2022

Conversation

lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr commented Feb 7, 2022

the guard test was tested to cause a segfault with -Zchalk, very nice

cc @nikomatsakis #44491 #25860

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Feb 7, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 7, 2022
Copy link
Member

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me (mostly just rubber stamping) with nit fixed

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcnr commented Feb 7, 2022

@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 7, 2022

📌 Commit c2a8077b44680fcd029714030b2722645b07d769 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 7, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r- (per tidy failure)

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 7, 2022
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcnr commented Feb 8, 2022

woops, thanks 👍

@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 8, 2022

📌 Commit af9e30a has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 8, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2022
add fut/back compat tests for implied trait bounds

the `guard` test was tested to cause a segfault with `-Zchalk`, very nice

cc `@nikomatsakis` rust-lang#44491 rust-lang#25860
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#91950 (Point at type when a `static` `#[global_allocator]` doesn't `impl` `GlobalAlloc`)
 - rust-lang#92715 (Do not suggest char literal for zero-length strings)
 - rust-lang#92917 (Don't constrain projection predicates with inference vars in GAT substs)
 - rust-lang#93206 (Use `NtCreateFile` instead of `NtOpenFile` to open a file)
 - rust-lang#93732 (add fut/back compat tests for implied trait bounds)
 - rust-lang#93764 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)
 - rust-lang#93767 (deduplicate `lcnr` in mailmap)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e881d65 into rust-lang:master Feb 9, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.60.0 milestone Feb 9, 2022
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants