Skip to content

rustdoc --check option documentation #94015

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 16, 2022
Merged

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Part of #92763.

r? @notriddle

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez added T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. A-docs Area: Documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools labels Feb 15, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 15, 2022
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Updated (and thanks for the doc suggestion!).

@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 15, 2022

📌 Commit 571e766447b25e8de12b6908b7caa850aeb7862c has been approved by notriddle

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 15, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Forgot that all code blocks are rust ones by default...

@bors: r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 15, 2022
@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

Okay.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 15, 2022

📌 Commit 590ca7e has been approved by notriddle

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 15, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2022
…iddle

rustdoc --check option documentation

Part of rust-lang#92763.

r? `@notriddle`
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2022
…iddle

rustdoc --check option documentation

Part of rust-lang#92763.

r? ``@notriddle``
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#92366 (Resolve concern of `derive_default_enum`)
 - rust-lang#93382 (Add a bit more padding in search box)
 - rust-lang#93962 (Make [u8]::cmp implementation branchless)
 - rust-lang#94015 (rustdoc --check option documentation)
 - rust-lang#94017 (Clarify confusing UB statement in MIR)
 - rust-lang#94020 (Support pretty printing of invalid constants)
 - rust-lang#94027 (Update browser UI test version)
 - rust-lang#94037 (Fix inconsistent symbol mangling with -Zverbose)
 - rust-lang#94045 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#94054 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 75a631d into rust-lang:master Feb 16, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.60.0 milestone Feb 16, 2022
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the check-option branch February 16, 2022 22:15
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-docs Area: Documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants