-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
Fix documentation for is_X_feature_detected! #94095
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
These are now properly documented for all architectures and the stability attributes in the docs are now correctly displayed.
r? @dtolnay (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 2b3fa06 has been approved by |
This should be included in the beta cutoff for tomorrow. @bors p=1 |
Fix documentation for is_X_feature_detected! These are now properly documented for all architectures and the stability attributes in the docs are now correctly displayed. This addresses this comment by `@ehuss:` rust-lang#90271 (comment) cc `@adamgemmell`
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (f838a42): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. 7 results were found to be statistically significant but too small to be relevant. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
These are now properly documented for all architectures and the
stability attributes in the docs are now correctly displayed.
This addresses this comment by @ehuss: #90271 (comment)
cc @adamgemmell