-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
document rustc_middle::mir::Field #94113
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @estebank (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 6210208 has been approved by |
document rustc_middle::mir::Field cc rust-lang#94025
document rustc_middle::mir::Field cc rust-lang#94025
document rustc_middle::mir::Field cc rust-lang#94025
document rustc_middle::mir::Field cc rust-lang#94025
@bors r- |
might have been unrelated to the failure |
📌 Commit 6210208 has been approved by |
document rustc_middle::mir::Field cc rust-lang#94025
|
…askrgr Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#93580 (Stabilize pin_static_ref.) - rust-lang#93639 (Release notes for 1.59) - rust-lang#93686 (core: Implement ASCII trim functions on byte slices) - rust-lang#94002 (rustdoc: Avoid duplicating macros in sidebar) - rust-lang#94019 (removing architecture requirements for RustyHermit) - rust-lang#94023 (adapt static-nobundle test to use llvm-nm) - rust-lang#94091 (Fix rustdoc const computed value) - rust-lang#94093 (Fix pretty printing of enums without variants) - rust-lang#94097 (Add module-level docs for `rustc_middle::query`) - rust-lang#94112 (Optimize char_try_from_u32) - rust-lang#94113 (document rustc_middle::mir::Field) - rust-lang#94122 (Fix miniz_oxide types showing up in std docs) - rust-lang#94142 (rustc_typeck: adopt let else in more places) - rust-lang#94146 (Adopt let else in more places) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Hmm @matthiaskrgr, hasn't this been merged as part of #94174? |
Yes. Looks like the author pushed/rebased between creation and merge of the rollup so git didn't auto-detect the merge and didn't close the pr. |
cc #94025