Rollup of 10 pull requests #94532
Closed
Rollup of 10 pull requests #94532
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Following up on rust-lang#88564, this adds documentation explaining why `BorrowedFd::to_owned` returns another `BorrowedFd` rather than an `OwnedFd`. And similar for `BorrowedHandle` and `BorrowedSocket`.
This change weakens the descriptions of the
`{as,into,from}_raw_{fd,handle,socket}` descriptions from saying that
they *do* express ownership relations to say that they are *typically used*
in ways that express ownership relations. This needed needed since, for
example, std's own [`RawFd`] implements `{As,From,Into}Fd` without any of
the ownership relationships.
This adds proper `# Safety` comments to `from_raw_{fd,handle,socket}`,
adds the requirement that raw handles be not opened with the
`FILE_FLAG_OVERLAPPED` flag, and merges the `OwnedHandle::from_raw_handle`
comment into the main `FromRawHandle::from_raw_handle` comment.
And, this changes `HandleOrNull` and `HandleOrInvalid` to not implement
`FromRawHandle`, since they are intended for limited use in FFI situations,
and not for generic use, and they have constraints that are stronger than
the those of `FromRawHandle`.
[`RawFd`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/os/unix/io/type.RawFd.html
This function is documented in more detail in the `FromRawSocket` trait.
Also, rename `BorrowedHandle::borrow_raw_handle` and `BorrowedSocket::borrow_raw_socket` to `BorrowedHandle::borrow_raw` and `BorrowedSocket::borrow_raw`. This is just a minor rename to reduce redundancy in the user code calling these functions, and to eliminate an inessential difference between `BorrowedFd` code and `BorrowedHandle`/`BorrowedSocket` code. While here, add a simple test exercising `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw_fd`.
Only point at the end of the crate. We could try making it point at the beginning of the crate, but that is confused with `DUMMY_SP`, causing the output to be *worse*. This change will make it so that VSCode will *not* underline the whole file when `main` is missing, so other errors will be visible.
Add `rustc_middle::ty::suggest_constraining_type_params` that suggests adding multiple constraints. `suggest_constraining_type_param` now just forwards params to this new function.
Previously we've only suggested adding `Copy` bounds when the type being moved/copied is a type parameter (generic). With this commit we also suggest adding bounds when a type - Can be copy - All predicates that need to be satisfied for that are based on type params i.e. we will suggest `T: Copy` for `Option<T>`, but won't suggest anything for `Option<String>`. Future work: it would be nice to also suggest adding `.clone()` calls
Modify the tier 3 non-ARM targets to show the standard library will no longer build for these and there is no work being done to change that.
adds more archs for openbsd: arm, mips64, powerpc, powerpc64, and riscv64.
update char signess for openbsd it adds more archs support for openbsd: arm, mips64, powerpc, powerpc64, and riscv64.
Do not point at whole file missing `fn main` Only point at the end of the crate. We could try making it point at the beginning of the crate, but that is confused with `DUMMY_SP`, causing the output to be *worse*. This change will make it so that VSCode will *not* underline the whole file when `main` is missing, so other errors will be visible.
…rrowedfd-toowned, r=joshtriplett Add documentation about `BorrowedFd::to_owned`. Following up on rust-lang#88564, this adds documentation explaining why `BorrowedFd::to_owned` returns another `BorrowedFd` rather than an `OwnedFd`. And similar for `BorrowedHandle` and `BorrowedSocket`. r? ``@joshtriplett``
…joshtriplett
Update the documentation for `{As,Into,From}Raw{Fd,Handle,Socket}`.
This change weakens the descriptions of the
`{as,into,from}_raw_{fd,handle,socket}` descriptions from saying that
they *do* express ownership relations to say that they are *typically used*
in ways that express ownership relations. This is needed since, for
example, std's own [`RawFd`] implements `{As,From,Into}Fd` without any of
the ownership relationships.
This adds proper `# Safety` comments to `from_raw_{fd,handle,socket}`,
adds the requirement that raw handles be not opened with the
`FILE_FLAG_OVERLAPPED` flag, and merges the `OwnedHandle::from_raw_handle`
comment into the main `FromRawHandle::from_raw_handle` comment.
And, this changes `HandleOrNull` and `HandleOrInvalid` to not implement
`FromRawHandle`, since they are intended for limited use in FFI situations,
and not for generic use, and they have constraints that are stronger than
the those of `FromRawHandle`.
[`RawFd`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/os/unix/io/type.RawFd.html
…, r=joshtriplett Rename `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw_fd` to `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw`. Also, rename `BorrowedHandle::borrow_raw_handle` and `BorrowedSocket::borrow_raw_socket` to `BorrowedHandle::borrow_raw` and `BorrowedSocket::borrow_raw`. This is just a minor rename to reduce redundancy in the user code calling these functions, and to eliminate an inessential difference between `BorrowedFd` code and `BorrowedHandle`/`BorrowedSocket` code. While here, add a simple test exercising `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw_fd`. r? ``@joshtriplett``
Ensure stability directives are checked in all cases Split off rust-lang#93017 Stability and deprecation were not checked in all cases, for instance if a type error happened. This PR moves the check earlier in the pipeline to ensure the errors are emitted in all cases. r? `````@lcnr`````
…ebank
Adt copy suggestions
Previously we've only suggested adding `Copy` bounds when the type being moved/copied is a type parameter (generic). With this PR we also suggest adding bounds when a type
- Can be copy
- All predicates that need to be satisfied for that are based on type params
i.e. we will suggest `T: Copy` for `Option<T>`, but won't suggest anything for `Option<String>`.
An example:
```rust
fn duplicate<T>(t: Option<T>) -> (Option<T>, Option<T>) {
(t, t)
}
```
New error (current compiler doesn't provide `help`:):
```text
error[E0382]: use of moved value: `t`
--> t.rs:2:9
|
1 | fn duplicate<T>(t: Option<T>) -> (Option<T>, Option<T>) {
| - move occurs because `t` has type `Option<T>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
2 | (t, t)
| - ^ value used here after move
| |
| value moved here
|
help: consider restricting type parameter `T`
|
1 | fn duplicate<T: Copy>(t: Option<T>) -> (Option<T>, Option<T>) {
| ++++++
```
Fixes rust-lang#93623
r? ``````@estebank``````
``````@rustbot`````` label +A-diagnostics +A-suggestion-diagnostics +C-enhancement
----
I'm not at all sure if this is the right implementation for this kind of suggestion, but it seems to work :')
Documentation was missed when demoting Windows XP to no_std only After a quick discussion on rust-lang#81250 which removed special casing for mutexes added [here](rust-lang@10b103a) to support Windows XP, we can't say that the standard library can build for it. This change modifies the tier 3 non-ARM targets to show the standard library will no longer build for these and there is no work being done to change that.
Miri/CTFE: properly treat overflow in (signed) division/rem as UB To my surprise, it looks like LLVM treats overflow of signed div/rem as UB. From what I can tell, MIR `Div`/`Rem` directly lowers to the corresponding LLVM operation, so to make that correct we also have to consider these overflows UB in the CTFE/Miri interpreter engine. r? `````@oli-obk`````
…lacrum Remove num_cpus dependency from bootstrap, build-manifest and rustc_s… …ession `std::threads::available_parallelism` was stabilized in rust 1.59. r? ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
rustbot
added
T-compiler
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=10 |
|
📌 Commit fd8058a has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
⌛ Testing commit fd8058a with merge 4c14741caf7ad2865f1ba1e9bf3fd3a9013f30ed... |
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
This was referenced Mar 2, 2022
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
fn main#93142 (Do not point at whole file missingfn main)BorrowedFd::to_owned. #93354 (Add documentation aboutBorrowedFd::to_owned.){As,Into,From}Raw{Fd,Handle,Socket}. #93562 (Update the documentation for{As,Into,From}Raw{Fd,Handle,Socket}.)BorrowedFd::borrow_raw_fdtoBorrowedFd::borrow_raw. #93663 (RenameBorrowedFd::borrow_raw_fdtoBorrowedFd::borrow_raw.)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup