Skip to content

Add known-bug for #95034 #95102

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2022
Merged

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors commented Mar 19, 2022

Couldn't fix the issue, since I am no type theorist and inference variables in universes above U0 scare me. But I at least wanted to add a known-bug test for it.

cc #95034 (does not fix)

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Mar 19, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 19, 2022
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
// known-bug
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I might take all of these and turn them into like... known-ice or something. Like automatically expect failure status 101, set backtrace=0, normalize all of the ICE notes, etc.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would be nice :)

@compiler-errors compiler-errors changed the title Add known-bug for #94034 Add known-bug for #95034 Mar 19, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@jackh726
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

r? @jackh726

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 24, 2022

📌 Commit 1e5d99c5908702e19cef3e5cd7bb4e5b949197ea has been approved by jackh726

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 24, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 24, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 1e5d99c5908702e19cef3e5cd7bb4e5b949197ea with merge 0db846cbef35341d3605ff125d06909ec27f8a49...

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 24, 2022

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 24, 2022
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

I added more test normalization, to account for wasm32 target not ICEing in the same place...

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

pnkfelix commented Apr 7, 2022

@bors r=jackh726

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 7, 2022

📌 Commit d5a32d8 has been approved by jackh726

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 7, 2022
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

my bad, should've guessed i was allowed to r= this again. was unsure since i changed the commit to deal with the ICE, but then again this is just a ui test.

Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2022
…jackh726

Add known-bug for rust-lang#95034

Couldn't fix the issue, since I am no type theorist and inference variables in universes above U0 scare me. But I at least wanted to add a known-bug test for it.

cc rust-lang#95034 (does not fix)
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2022
…jackh726

Add known-bug for rust-lang#95034

Couldn't fix the issue, since I am no type theorist and inference variables in universes above U0 scare me. But I at least wanted to add a known-bug test for it.

cc rust-lang#95034 (does not fix)
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2022
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#95102 (Add known-bug for rust-lang#95034)
 - rust-lang#95579 (Add `<[[T; N]]>::flatten{_mut}`)
 - rust-lang#95634 (Mailmap update)
 - rust-lang#95705 (Promote x86_64-unknown-none target to Tier 2 and distribute build artifacts)
 - rust-lang#95761 (Kickstart the inner usage of `macro_metavar_expr`)
 - rust-lang#95782 (Windows: Increase a pipe's buffer capacity to 64kb)
 - rust-lang#95791 (hide an #[allow] directive from the Arc::new_cyclic doc example)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 94ffb29 into rust-lang:master Apr 8, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.62.0 milestone Apr 8, 2022
@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the issue-94034-bug branch August 11, 2023 20:05
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants