Skip to content

Implement apply_switch_int_edge_effects for backward analyses #95120

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 28, 2022

Conversation

smoelius
Copy link
Contributor

See #94576 for some discussion.

r? @ecstatic-morse

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Mar 19, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 19, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@ecstatic-morse ecstatic-morse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Implementation looks good for the most part. Left a few comments. When there's a pass that actually uses this it would be good to add a peek test to ensure that it computes the correct results.

* Add lazily computed `switch_sources` data structure
* Don't assume a target has only one associated value
@smoelius smoelius force-pushed the backward-switch-int branch from 848a49b to 37ebd47 Compare March 26, 2022 13:12
@smoelius smoelius changed the title Implement apply_switch_int_edge_effect for backward analyses Implement apply_switch_int_edge_effects for backward analyses Mar 26, 2022
@smoelius
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ecstatic-morse I think 37ebd47 addresses your comments and the bug that I found.

@ecstatic-morse
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Hopefully this is useful to you.

Now that we have 3 different cached computations on MIR bodies with the same implementation, we probably want some sort of generalized framework.

@ecstatic-morse
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 27, 2022

📌 Commit 241ec5b has been approved by ecstatic-morse

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 27, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2022
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#94939 (diagnostics: suggest missing comma in bad FRU syntax)
 - rust-lang#95120 (Implement `apply_switch_int_edge_effects` for backward analyses)
 - rust-lang#95364 (Add long error explanation for E0667)
 - rust-lang#95366 (Remove test files with duplicated checksums)
 - rust-lang#95368 (Fix typo in `String::try_reserve_exact` docs)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit a8be562 into rust-lang:master Mar 28, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.61.0 milestone Mar 28, 2022
@smoelius smoelius deleted the backward-switch-int branch March 28, 2022 08:48
@JakobDegen JakobDegen mentioned this pull request May 7, 2022
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants