Skip to content

Conversation

Urgau
Copy link
Member

@Urgau Urgau commented Mar 21, 2022

Forgot to update the unstable book in #94362

r? @petrochenkov

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 21, 2022
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 21, 2022

📌 Commit c6c14a0 has been approved by petrochenkov

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 21, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2022
…k, r=petrochenkov

Update the unstable book with the new `values()` form of check-cfg

Forgot to update the unstable book in rust-lang#94362

r? `@petrochenkov`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#95074 (Refactor: use `format-args-capture` and remove unnecessary nested if blocks in some parts of `rust_passes`)
 - rust-lang#95085 (Return err instead of ICE)
 - rust-lang#95116 (Add needs-* directives to many tests)
 - rust-lang#95129 (Remove animation on source sidebar)
 - rust-lang#95166 (Update the unstable book with the new `values()` form of check-cfg)
 - rust-lang#95175 (move `adt_const_params`  to its own tracking issue)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit aa9077e into rust-lang:master Mar 21, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.61.0 milestone Mar 21, 2022
@Urgau Urgau deleted the check-cfg-values-unstable-book branch May 5, 2023 16:45
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants