Skip to content

Fix typo in offset_from documentation #96639

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 6, 2022

Conversation

adpaco-aws
Copy link
Contributor

Small fix for what I think is a typo in the offset_from documentation.

Someone reading this may understand that the distance in bytes is obtained by dividing the distance by mem::size_of::<T>(), but here we just want to define "units of T" in terms of bytes (i.e., units of T == bytes / mem::size_of::<T>()).

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with r? rust-lang/libs-api @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to request review from a libs-api team reviewer. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label May 2, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @scottmcm (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 2, 2022
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

scottmcm commented May 6, 2022

Thanks! I agree this is clearer without the is.

@bors r+ rollup=always

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 6, 2022

📌 Commit 9b36a47 has been approved by scottmcm

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 6, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 6, 2022
…piler-errors

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#96174 (mark ptr-int-transmute test as no_run)
 - rust-lang#96639 (Fix typo in `offset_from` documentation)
 - rust-lang#96704 (Add rotation animation on settings button when loading)
 - rust-lang#96730 (Add a regression test for rust-lang#64173 and rust-lang#66152)
 - rust-lang#96741 (Improve settings loading strategy)
 - rust-lang#96744 (Implement [OsStr]::join)
 - rust-lang#96747 (Add `track_caller` to `DefId::expect_local()`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit ef949da into rust-lang:master May 6, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.62.0 milestone May 6, 2022
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants