-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.5k
Rollup of 6 pull requests #98820
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Rollup of 6 pull requests #98820
Conversation
Previously, it required you to manually run `x build` first, because it assumed the LLVM binaries were already present.
…39, r=Mark-Simulacrum Add regression test for rust-lang#50439 closes rust-lang#50439
…ulacrum add ice test for rust-lang#97047 Fixes rust-lang#97047
…crum Fix `x dist rust-dev` on a fresh checkout Previously, it required you to manually run `x build` first, because it assumed the LLVM binaries were already present.
Add rust-lang#95469 to the release notes rust-lang#95469 may break programs using async file handles so it should've been noted in compatibility notes (sorry).
…acrum feat: Add a documentation problem issue template Fixes rust-lang#98722 :)
update Miri Fixes rust-lang#98779 r? `@ghost`
@bors r+ p=5 |
📌 Commit 434ce76 has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Tested on commit rust-lang/rust@f2d9393. Direct link to PR: <rust-lang/rust#98820> 🎉 miri on windows: test-fail → test-pass (cc @oli-obk @RalfJung). 🎉 miri on linux: test-fail → test-pass (cc @oli-obk @RalfJung).
Finished benchmarking commit (f2d9393): comparison url. Instruction count
Max RSS (memory usage)Results
CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression Footnotes |
No changes in compiler/lib, but number of query calls on perf run changed (for example https://perf.rust-lang.org/detailed-query.html?commit=f2d93935ffba3ab9d7ccb5300771a2d29b4c8bf3&base_commit=750d6f85459356db4838dc06db8b19406e1ed31a&benchmark=html5ever-0.26.0-debug&scenario=incr-unchanged), what the source of it can be? |
Based on a wider view of benchmarks over the last week, fairly certain these results were noise -- probably some new non-determinism has snuck in. Dropping regression label. |
Successful merges:
generic_const_exprs
andadt_const_params
#97047)x dist rust-dev
on a fresh checkout #98753 (Fixx dist rust-dev
on a fresh checkout)File
methods #95469 to the release notes)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup