Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

gen_ratio -> random_probability, gen_bool -> random_probability_f64 #1527

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

oconnor663
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure I actually love these names, but I wanted to continue the discussion that @dhardy and @newpavlov were having in #1488. What do you guys think of this option?

@dhardy
Copy link
Member

dhardy commented Nov 13, 2024

I don't much like this — too long, _f64 is too specific.

@newpavlov's suggestion to use some trait like IntoProbability supporting f64 and (u32, u32) might be more accepatble; I'm not certain.

@oconnor663
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah that's fair. There's some precedent in the standard library, but maybe it doesn't feel great there either.

@dhardy dhardy closed this Jan 3, 2025
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants