Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Fix test_properties command logic #1180

Merged

Conversation

Zuz666
Copy link
Contributor

@Zuz666 Zuz666 commented Nov 6, 2021

This change is necessary because the current logic of test_properties command in some cases leads to an error on converting the exception object, as well as an inaccurate output if only one parameter is possible during the miIO request.

@Zuz666 Zuz666 marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2021 12:38
Copy link
Owner

@rytilahti rytilahti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 6, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #1180 (10e7c65) into master (210e818) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1180   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.30%   78.30%           
=======================================
  Files          84       84           
  Lines        9526     9526           
  Branches      776      776           
=======================================
  Hits         7459     7459           
  Misses       1880     1880           
  Partials      187      187           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
miio/device.py 53.79% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 210e818...10e7c65. Read the comment docs.

@rytilahti rytilahti merged commit b1f8f68 into rytilahti:master Nov 6, 2021
@rytilahti rytilahti added the bug label Nov 30, 2021
@rytilahti rytilahti mentioned this pull request Nov 30, 2021
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants