Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom

Is template: jinja a duplicated line? #51

Closed
lesar opened this issue Oct 27, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Is template: jinja a duplicated line? #51

lesar opened this issue Oct 27, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
released

Comments

@lesar
Copy link
Contributor

lesar commented Oct 27, 2021

I'm new on saltstack and I'm learning by reading formulas.

init.sls Line 15 seams a duplicate of line 11 to me.

I'm in error?
@lesar lesar changed the title Is template: jinja duplicate Is template: jinja duplicate? Oct 27, 2021
@lesar lesar changed the title Is template: jinja duplicate? Is template: jinja a duplicated line? Oct 27, 2021
@myii
Copy link
Member

myii commented Oct 27, 2021

I'm new on saltstack and I'm learning by reading formulas.

init.sls Line 15 seams a duplicate of line 11 to me.

I'm in error?

@lesar You're right -- good catch! Would you like to submit a PR to fix that?

@lesar
Copy link
Contributor Author

lesar commented Oct 27, 2021

ok

@lesar lesar closed this as completed Oct 27, 2021
myii pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2021
@lesar
fix(init): remove duplicate template: jinja line
f83bb1b 
fix duplication line on init.sls (#52)

fixes #51

remove duplicated line number 15
saltstack-formulas-travis pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2021
@semantic-release-bot
chore(release): 0.15.5 [skip ci]
11d7fe7 
## [0.15.5](v0.15.4...v0.15.5) (2021-10-27)

### Bug Fixes

* **init:** remove duplicate `template: jinja` line ([f83bb1b](f83bb1b)), closes [#52](#52) [#51](#51)

### Continuous Integration

* **3003.1:** update inc. AlmaLinux, Rocky & `rst-lint` [skip ci] ([60bd7fa](60bd7fa))
* **gemfile+lock:** use `ssf` customised `inspec` repo [skip ci] ([a411383](a411383))
* **kitchen:** move `provisioner` block & update `run_command` [skip ci] ([0a671a7](0a671a7))
* **kitchen+ci:** update with latest `3003.2` pre-salted images [skip ci] ([4bcede1](4bcede1))
* **kitchen+ci:** update with latest CVE pre-salted images [skip ci] ([12f3254](12f3254))
* add `arch-master` to matrix and update `.travis.yml` [skip ci] ([a659899](a659899))
* add Debian 11 Bullseye & update `yamllint` configuration [skip ci] ([305701d](305701d))
* **kitchen+ci:** use latest pre-salted images (after CVE) [skip ci] ([82c9074](82c9074))
* **kitchen+gitlab:** adjust matrix to add `3003` [skip ci] ([e4e58d4](e4e58d4))
* **kitchen+gitlab:** remove Ubuntu 16.04 & Fedora 32 (EOL) [skip ci] ([516042f](516042f))

### Tests

* standardise use of `share` suite & `_mapdata` state [skip ci] ([90a3fdc](90a3fdc))
@saltstack-formulas-travis
Copy link

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 0.15.5 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
released
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@lesar @myii @saltstack-formulas-travis