You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
it is great that 1.18 supports the normalization of symbolic <DEL> notation. But some of the called deletions in my data are of length bigger than 20.000.000 bp (they are probably false positives, but these things might happen with e.g. with radiotherapy). Instead of the symbolic representation bcftools norm transforms them to explicit representation, so it write the complete 20.000.000 bp to the records ref field.
While technically correct, I would HIGHLY prefer the previous <DEL> instead. Maybe an optional flag or threshold when to do the explicit / symbolic representation would be nice
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This was actually not intended, thank you for reporting the problem. I believe the ALT column behaved correctly, the problem was in expanding the REF allele. It is now fixed.
Symbolic <DEL> alleles caused norm to expand REF to the full length of the deletion.
This was not intended and was problematic for long deletions, the REF allele should list
one base only.
Resolves#2029
pd3
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 1, 2023
Symbolic <DEL> alleles caused norm to expand REF to the full length of the deletion.
This was not intended and was problematic for long deletions, the REF allele should list
one base only.
Resolves#2029
Hi,
it is great that 1.18 supports the normalization of symbolic
<DEL>
notation. But some of the called deletions in my data are of length bigger than 20.000.000 bp (they are probably false positives, but these things might happen with e.g. with radiotherapy). Instead of the symbolic representation bcftools norm transforms them to explicit representation, so it write the complete 20.000.000 bp to the records ref field.While technically correct, I would HIGHLY prefer the previous
<DEL>
instead. Maybe an optional flag or threshold when to do the explicit / symbolic representation would be niceThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: