Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

chore: merge next into corel #8139

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 27, 2024
Merged

chore: merge next into corel #8139

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 27, 2024

Conversation

jordanl17
Copy link
Member

Description

What to review

Testing

Notes for release

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 24, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 25, 2024 2:09am
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 25, 2024 2:09am
test-next-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 25, 2024 2:09am
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 25, 2024 2:09am
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 25, 2024 2:09am

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Dec 24, 2024

🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.

Alert Package NoteSourceCI
License Policy Violation npm/next@15.1.2
  • License: CC-BY-SA-4.0 - Not allowed by license policy (package/dist/compiled/glob/LICENSE, package/dist/compiled/glob/LICENSE)
⚠︎
License Policy Violation npm/next@14.2.21
  • License: CC-BY-SA-4.0 - Not allowed by license policy (package/dist/compiled/glob/LICENSE, package/dist/compiled/glob/LICENSE)
⚠︎

View full report↗︎

Next steps

What is a license policy violation?

This package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.

Find a package that does not violate your license policy or adjust your policy to allow this package's license.

Take a deeper look at the dependency

Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev.

Remove the package

If you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency.

Mark a package as acceptable risk

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of ecosystem/package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore npm/foo@1.0.0 or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all

  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/next@15.1.2
  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/next@14.2.21

Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Component Testing Report Updated Dec 27, 2024 2:55 PM (UTC)

✅ All Tests Passed -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 4s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 13s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 39s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 52s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 14s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 27s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 8s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 28s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 40s 18 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 13s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 43s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 24, 2024

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Fri, 27 Dec 2024 14:58:00 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 26.3 efps (38ms) 20.6 efps (49ms) +11ms (+27.6%) 🔴
article (body) 77.8 efps (13ms) 72.7 efps (14ms) +1ms (-/-%)
article (string inside object) 28.6 efps (35ms) 21.3 efps (47ms) +12ms (+34.3%) 🔴
article (string inside array) 26.0 efps (39ms) 19.2 efps (52ms) +14ms (+35.1%) 🔴
recipe (name) 54.1 efps (19ms) 28.6 efps (35ms) +17ms (+89.2%) 🔴
recipe (description) 66.7 efps (15ms) 30.3 efps (33ms) +18ms (+120.0%) 🔴
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (6ms) 99.9+ efps (5ms) -1ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 18.9 efps (53ms) 8.1 efps (123ms) +70ms (+132.1%) 🔴
synthetic (string inside object) 20.0 efps (50ms) 7.9 efps (127ms) +77ms (+154.0%) 🔴

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 38ms 42ms 51ms 476ms 201ms 10.1s
article (body) 13ms 15ms 17ms 63ms 191ms 4.7s
article (string inside object) 35ms 39ms 42ms 266ms 281ms 6.6s
article (string inside array) 39ms 40ms 44ms 153ms 139ms 6.6s
recipe (name) 19ms 20ms 22ms 57ms 0ms 6.8s
recipe (description) 15ms 18ms 21ms 33ms 0ms 4.3s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 8ms 9ms 22ms 0ms 3.3s
synthetic (title) 53ms 56ms 62ms 290ms 567ms 13.1s
synthetic (string inside object) 50ms 53ms 60ms 565ms 910ms 8.2s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 49ms 54ms 64ms 208ms 1059ms 11.2s
article (body) 14ms 16ms 18ms 174ms 216ms 4.9s
article (string inside object) 47ms 51ms 58ms 242ms 433ms 8.1s
article (string inside array) 52ms 57ms 70ms 218ms 718ms 8.3s
recipe (name) 35ms 39ms 52ms 87ms 38ms 8.9s
recipe (description) 33ms 34ms 38ms 127ms 1ms 6.2s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 6ms 7ms 18ms 0ms 3.0s
synthetic (title) 123ms 132ms 147ms 367ms 6133ms 20.3s
synthetic (string inside object) 127ms 138ms 143ms 505ms 5339ms 14.5s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

@jordanl17 jordanl17 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 27, 2024 14:49
@jordanl17 jordanl17 requested review from cngonzalez and removed request for a team and cngonzalez December 27, 2024 14:49
@jordanl17 jordanl17 merged commit c4c664f into corel Dec 27, 2024
95 of 100 checks passed
@jordanl17 jordanl17 deleted the corel-next-merge-dec-24 branch December 27, 2024 15:09
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant