You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been contemplating this issue for a while. I'm comparing the same cell type across two datasets that used different sequencing technologies: Smart-seq2 for the control condition and 10x for the disease condition. This introduces a significant batch effect due to the technological differences. I assume that a corrected matrix should be used for DEG analysis. However, I noticed in discussions such as issue #5881 that it is often recommended to use the RNA assay for DEGs analysis, which has left me confused. How can I ensure that the DEGs reflect the biological condition (control vs. disease) rather than the sequencing technology differences?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Seurat community!
I've been contemplating this issue for a while. I'm comparing the same cell type across two datasets that used different sequencing technologies: Smart-seq2 for the control condition and 10x for the disease condition. This introduces a significant batch effect due to the technological differences. I assume that a corrected matrix should be used for DEG analysis. However, I noticed in discussions such as issue #5881 that it is often recommended to use the RNA assay for DEGs analysis, which has left me confused. How can I ensure that the DEGs reflect the biological condition (control vs. disease) rather than the sequencing technology differences?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: