-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 506
Is scala steward still running #2733
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Comments
ICYMI: currently the scala-steward instance is maintained by VirtusLab: https://github.com/VirtusLab/scala-steward-repos |
Thanks. "my" repositories are listed in those repos. |
Ups... Probably need to ask them for the service restart. |
Can I help? |
Nobody from VirtusLab is watching this repo, so I would suggest asking that in https://github.com/VirtusLab/scala-steward-repos. |
I don't see any way to interact with anyone on #2733 (comment). There are no issues, nothing. |
Trying to catch @tgodzik attention. |
Looking into that, I assumed that it was setup correctly previously, but I think something might be off. There is not enough PRs on https://github.com/scala-steward I wonder why no one reported anything 🤔 |
What would be the proper channel for such reports? Maybe enabling issues in https://github.com/VirtusLab/scala-steward-repos would be helpful. |
Enabled issues in the repo! Looks like the steward job is getting a lot of timeouts from github, though I don't have a direct access to the azure job yet, looking into that. |
Github is not happy, seems there is limit on ither creating or querying pull requests.
|
I restarted the container, let's see if the github issues were temporary or something we need to deal with. |
I've seen the secondary rate limit issue before in #2355 but that only happened when Scala Steward created a lot of PRs in a short time frame - usually when there was a new Scala or sbt release. But this was always temporary and Scala Steward was always able to create PRs on the next run. |
Ok, the rerun managed to create a bunch of PRs but after a short while again 403. Might be related to the fact that we haven't run it for a while. |
|
Though I also see |
I guess this can be closed? The spice seems to be flowing again |
👍 |
I don't receive any updates anymore in open source libraries (sangria for example).
Is the bot still running? Do you need help?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: