Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom

Check user defined PolyFunction refinements #18457

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 12, 2023
Merged

Check user defined PolyFunction refinements #18457

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 12, 2023

Conversation

nicolasstucki
Copy link
Contributor

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki commented Aug 25, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Fixes #8299
Fixes #18302

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki marked this pull request as ready for review August 28, 2023 09:10
smarter
smarter approved these changes Oct 6, 2023
View reviewed changes
compiler/src/dotty/tools/dotc/typer/Checking.scala Outdated
traverseChildren(tree)

def reportNoRefinements(pos: SrcPos) =
report.error("PolyFunction refinement must have a refinements of the apply method", pos)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
report.error("PolyFunction refinement must have a refinements of the apply method", pos)
report.error("PolyFunction subtypes must refine the apply method", pos)

@smarter smarter assigned nicolasstucki and unassigned smarter Oct 6, 2023
@nicolasstucki
Check user defined PolyFunction refinements
e5ca0c4 
`PolyFunction` must be refined with an `apply` method that has a single
parameter list with no by-name nor varargs parameters. It may optionally
have type parameters. Some of these restrictions could be lifted later,
but for now these features are not properly handled by the compiler.

Fixes scala#8299
Fixes scala#18302
@nicolasstucki
Add isMethodWithByNameArgs
9966ced
@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki merged commit 12a373f into scala:main Oct 12, 2023
16 checks passed
@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki deleted the fix-18302 branch October 12, 2023 16:16
@Kordyjan Kordyjan added this to the 3.4.0 milestone Dec 20, 2023
@xuwei-k
Copy link
Contributor

xuwei-k commented Dec 23, 2023

😢

Welcome to Scala 3.4.0-RC1 (1.8.0_392, Java OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM).
Type in expressions for evaluation. Or try :help.
                                                                                                                                             
scala> val x = [a] => (b: a) => b
val x: [a] => (b: a) => a = Lambda$1345/1620368915@5d1bdd4a
                                                                                                                                             
scala> x: PolyFunction
java.lang.ClassCastException: rs$line$1$$$Lambda$1345/1620368915 cannot be cast to scala.PolyFunction
  ... 35 elided

@xuwei-k xuwei-k mentioned this pull request Dec 23, 2023
Closed
@WojciechMazur WojciechMazur mentioned this pull request Jun 19, 2024
Merged
WojciechMazur added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2024
@WojciechMazur
Backport "Check user defined PolyFunction refinements " to LTS (#20647)
739f55a 
Backports #18457 to the LTS branch.

PR submitted by the release tooling.
[skip ci]
@WojciechMazur WojciechMazur mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2024
Merged
WojciechMazur added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2024
@WojciechMazur
Backport "Check user defined PolyFunction refinements " to LTS (#20700)
3b94fb2 
Backports #18457 to the LTS branch.

PR submitted by the release tooling.
[skip ci]
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Reviewers

@smarter smarter smarter approved these changes

Assignees

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.4.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Invalid PolyFunction refinements explicit "PolyFunction" type annotation cause ClassCastException
4 participants
@nicolasstucki @xuwei-k @smarter @Kordyjan