Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Correctly ghost the last block in the stack. #172

Merged

Conversation

rachel-fenichel
Copy link
Collaborator

Builds on #171

@rachel-fenichel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

#140

@@ -886,6 +893,14 @@ Blockly.BlockSvg.prototype.updatePreviews = function(closestConnection,
if (Blockly.insertionMarker_ && Blockly.insertionMarkerConnection_) {
Blockly.BlockSvg.disconnectInsertionMarker();
}
// If there's already an insertion marker but it's representing the wrong
// block, delete it so we can create the correct one.

This comment was marked as abuse.

This comment was marked as abuse.

@tmickel
Copy link
Contributor

tmickel commented Apr 7, 2016

One question but otherwise looks good. Thanks!

@tmickel tmickel assigned rachel-fenichel and unassigned tmickel Apr 7, 2016
@rachel-fenichel rachel-fenichel merged commit 8af37d7 into scratchfoundation:develop Apr 7, 2016
@rachel-fenichel rachel-fenichel deleted the feature/last_ghost branch April 7, 2016 00:30
@rachel-fenichel rachel-fenichel restored the feature/last_ghost branch April 7, 2016 00:48
cwillisf pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2024
* refactor: add and use explicit field registration methods

* chore: add comment to field registration methods
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants