文档 [What is SPU?]翻译成中文文档 #1041
文档 [What is SPU?]翻译成中文文档 #1041
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @2429887991, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request translates the English documentation for "What is SPU?" into Chinese. The changes involve updating the getting_started.po file within the docs/locales/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/ directory to provide a Chinese translation of the introductory text about SPU (Secure Processing Unit). The translated text explains the purpose and functionality of SPU, including its role as a compiler and runtime suite for secure computation, its support for XLA IR from various frameworks, and its extensible runtime architecture for MPC protocols.
Highlights
- Translation: The English documentation for 'What is SPU?' has been translated into Chinese.
- File Update: The
getting_started.pofile in the Chinese locale has been updated with the translated content. - SPU Explanation: The translated text provides a Chinese explanation of SPU's purpose, functionality, and architecture.
Changelog
- docs/locales/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/getting_started.po
- Translated 'What is SPU?' to 'SPU 是什么？' (line 361)
- Translated the description of SPU as a secure computation service (line 368)
- Translated the explanation of SPU compiler using XLA as its frontend IR and its support for TensorFlow, JAX, or PyTorch (line 380)
- Translated the description of SPU runtime implementing multiple MPC protocols and its extensible design (line 390)
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Did you know?
The field of secure multi-party computation (MPC) has its roots in the work of Andrew Yao, who introduced Yao's Millionaires' Problem in 1982, a foundational problem in secure computation.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request translates the English documentation for "What is SPU?" into Chinese. The changes look good overall, but I have a few suggestions to improve the clarity and accuracy of the translation.
Summary of Findings
- Clarity and Accuracy of Translation: Ensuring the translated text accurately reflects the original meaning and is easily understandable for a Chinese-speaking audience is crucial. Some phrases could be refined for better clarity.
- Consistency in Terminology: Maintaining consistency in the translation of technical terms throughout the document is important for avoiding confusion.
Merge Readiness
The pull request is almost ready for merging. Addressing the comments regarding clarity and terminology will further enhance the quality of the translation. I am unable to directly approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging. At a minimum, the high severity issues should be addressed before merging.
| "SPU (Secure Processing Unit) is a domain-specific **compiler and runtime " | ||
| "suite**, that aims to provide a **secure computation** service with " | ||
| "**provable security**." | ||
| msgstr "" | ||
| msgstr "SPU （安全处理单元） 是一种特定领域的编译器和运行时套件，旨在提供可证明安全性的安全计算服务。" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The translation of "provable security" could be more precise. Consider using "可验证的安全性" or "可信赖的安全性" for a stronger emphasis on verifiability or trustworthiness, respectively. The current translation "可证明安全性" is okay, but the alternatives might resonate better with a technical audience.
msgstr "SPU （安全处理单元） 是一种特定领域的编译器和运行时套件，旨在提供可验证的安全性的安全计算服务。"
|
Just push to the first PR's branch. You do not need to create multiple PRs. |
Pull Request
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: Fixed #1014
Possible side effects?
Performance:
Backward compatibility: