Skip to content

chore: update GitHub branch references to use HEAD #128

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 14, 2020

Conversation

thinkingserious
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist

  • I acknowledge that all my contributions will be made under the project's license

@thinkingserious thinkingserious added the status: code review request requesting a community code review or review from Twilio label Aug 5, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 5, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #128 into main will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main     #128   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     49.28%   49.28%           
  Complexity       38       38           
=========================================
  Files             5        5           
  Lines           211      211           
  Branches         16       16           
=========================================
  Hits            104      104           
  Misses          103      103           
  Partials          4        4           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5b113ce...13a6b1e. Read the comment docs.

@thinkingserious thinkingserious merged commit 803e357 into main Aug 14, 2020
@thinkingserious thinkingserious deleted the update-links branch August 14, 2020 18:11
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
status: code review request requesting a community code review or review from Twilio
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants