Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Add sqlx-ts under Compile-time checked queries (new category) #1249

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JasonShin
Copy link

By submitting this pull request, I promise I have read the contribution guidelines twice and ensured my submission follows it. I realize not doing so wastes the maintainers' time that they could have spent making the world better. 🖖

⬆⬆⬆⬆⬆⬆⬆⬆⬆⬆

Hi, I've recently worked on a project sqlx-ts

https://github.com/JasonShin/sqlx-ts

blog articles: https://functional.works-hub.com/learn/sqlx-ts-compile-time-checked-queries-with-dsl-in-typescript-9c47b

It is a tool that is featuring compile-time checked queries without a DSL and generates types against SQLs to keep your code type safe. It works nicely with node.js codebase as you can still use sqlx-ts to simply perform query validations only.

In the TS world, I firmly believe that it is a replacement of schemats listed under https://github.com/dzharii/awesome-typescript/blob/master/README.md#tools
-> This is because the project is unmaintained and sqlx-ts is written in Rust with all the modern capabilities

JasonShin and others added 2 commits October 1, 2023 14:31
Co-authored-by: Sindre Sorhus <sindresorhus@gmail.com>
@JasonShin JasonShin requested a review from sindresorhus October 1, 2023 03:35
@JasonShin
Copy link
Author

JasonShin commented Oct 1, 2023

@sindresorhus Thanks for the feedback. I've updated the PR based on the two comments and requesting for another review, thanks.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants