Combine measurements from multiple trials and experiments for the same code revision #164
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In this PR, we combine data in the comparison view for multiple experiment ids and trial ids.
We essentially stop using expId and trialId to distinguish data sets from now on.
Instead, we rely solely on commit ids.
The user interface of ReBenchDB is all around commit ids, so, it makes sense to combine multiple experiments that provide data for a specific revision, and the assumption is that there's no change in the setup, environment, benchmarks, or executors between different experiments on the same source revision.
As a consequence, the plots to visualize warmup data may need to show data from multiple trials/experiments.
The profiling info now can be a list of profiles, which are all shown under the corresponding revision.
We do not track invocation numbers anymore in the data for computing comparisons.
The reason is that we assume invocations to be independent, and it doesn't matter in which order they appeared.
This makes it simple to combine invocations from different experiments and trials, which are for the same experiments.
This fixes #158 and #159.